Course record PHYS

PHYS 3201

Modern Physics Lab and Data Analysis

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable13 professors
Evaluations: 2019–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 13 of 13

Ramiro Torres Escobedo 2 median item responses 3.05Eval / 5
Overall3.05 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.78
Course assignments facilitated learning3.16
Opportunities to be successful in course3.20
Ahmad Khayyat Jafari 5 median item responses 2.92Eval / 5
Overall2.92 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.65
Course assignments facilitated learning3.21
Opportunities to be successful in course2.91
Sayani Ghosh 5 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning4.12
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Yasir Iqbal 1 median item responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning3.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Yejin Kwon 2 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Gabriela Hamilton Ilha Machado 3 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Aaron M. Mankel 3 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Yelbir Kazhykarim 2 median item responses 3.46Eval / 5
Overall3.46 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.35
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.05
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.05
Nural Akchurin 6 median item responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.17
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.00
Valdis R. Slokenbergs 3 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.50
Niramay Gogate 2 median item responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Myoung Hwan Kim 3 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.53
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.31
Akshat Shrivastava 4 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
2 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.