Course record MUAP

MUAP 1124

Group Keyboard Instruction II

Texas Tech University

2 sections43 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2026
Flunk Score82/100
Excellent

Professors 43 of 43

Hyeseung Seo 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
92.0% A
4.0% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Carla Cash 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.64GPA
73.0% A
18.0% B
9.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Pei Han Lin 4 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Kevin M Nadolski 8 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.68
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.73
Priyeshni Jayathika Peiris 7 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Jeong Shim Baik 9 median item responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.28
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.34
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.68
Ji Yang 6 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.08
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.89
So Yoon Yoon 6 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.62
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Uzziel Guzman 11 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.36
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.66
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.87
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.87
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.81
Seong-Ae Lim 8 median item responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning3.90
Opportunities to be successful in course3.90
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.16
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.07
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.38
Leobardo Guerrero 4 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.66
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.85
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.51
Min Ji Lee 8 median item responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.78
Course assignments facilitated learning3.87
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.15
Yuway Chan 10 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Wen Ling Chua 10 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.51
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.66
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Heeseung Lee 9 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.89
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.89
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.89
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
Jimmy Nga 12 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.87
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Ekaterina Paniukova 10 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Hsin Yi Lee 10 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Sun Lee 12 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.92
Laura Lennis Cortes 4 median item responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.28
Opportunities to be successful in course4.23
Xin Wang 6 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Jeyeon Kim Kim 4 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.11
Mikhail Maurice Johnson 5 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Brooke Trapp 7 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.17
Lingxu Peng 4 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.23
Mauricio Starosta Neto 7 median item responses 3.18Eval / 5
Overall3.18 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.55
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.48
Johathan Guelfand 1 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Anna Vander Boon 7 median item responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.49
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Han Gao 2 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Jie Li 6 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Miri Park 6 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.66
Ting Ting Goh 3 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course3.78
Hanwen Yan 7 median item responses 3.28Eval / 5
Overall3.28 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course2.57
Nestor A. Guerrero Aguirre 1 median item responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Lingxi Xu 2 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Yuwei Jiang 4 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Xiao Han 2 median item responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning2.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills1.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.00
Soyoung Bae 1 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Seungwon Lee 1 median item responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.00
Course assignments facilitated learning3.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.00
Adam W. Smith 5 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.90
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.90
Wonkyung Kim 7 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Germano Gastal Mayer 9 median item responses 3.43Eval / 5
Overall3.43 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.67
Course assignments facilitated learning3.22
Opportunities to be successful in course3.44
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.11
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.22
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.11
Yu-Chien Huang 4 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.