Course record ME

ME 3370

Fluid Mechanics

Texas Tech University

9 sections29 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work

Professors 29 of 29

James Oler 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.56GPA
59.0% A
37.0% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Martin Azese 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.85GPA
15.0% A
62.0% B
15.0% C
8.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sukalyan Bhattacharya 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.64GPA
20.7% A
38.0% B
30.4% C
6.5% D
4.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Amar Patel 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.53GPA
11.5% A
43.8% B
35.4% C
6.3% D
3.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Darryl James 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.26GPA
6.9% A
31.0% B
47.1% C
11.5% D
3.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Zhaoming He 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.12GPA
16.5% A
22.8% B
27.8% C
21.5% D
11.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Christopher Bryson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.04GPA
12.0% A
33.7% B
8.7% C
37.0% D
8.7% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sourav Barman 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.03GPA
18.4% A
21.1% B
27.6% C
11.8% D
21.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Gordon Christopher 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 1.77GPA
9.5% A
20.2% B
29.8% C
20.2% D
20.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jerry R. Dunn 34 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

34 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.52
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.08
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.39
Sergey Andreevich Smirnov 20 median item responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.85
Course assignments facilitated learning3.42
Opportunities to be successful in course3.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.10
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.68
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.28
Andrew Mosedale 31 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

31 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.56
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.59
Craig Snoeyink 32 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.41
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.37
Shahin Navardi 39 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

39 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.55
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.13
Chris Bryson 23 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.26
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Jonathan Simmons 21 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.62
Victor H. Maldonado 29 median item responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Jingfei Liu 29 median item responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.09
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.82
Archis Marathe 16 median item responses 3.01Eval / 5
Overall3.01 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.63
Course assignments facilitated learning3.54
Opportunities to be successful in course2.86
Mark Vaughn 5 median item responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.10
Opportunities to be successful in course3.90
Haiwen Ge 15 median item responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.87
Course assignments facilitated learning3.80
Opportunities to be successful in course3.13
Kesha Gangopadhyay (Ganguly) 14 median item responses 3.16Eval / 5
Overall3.16 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.36
Course assignments facilitated learning2.57
Opportunities to be successful in course2.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.07
Michelle Pantoya 4 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Rakhitha Wishwajith Udugama Arachchilage 28 median item responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning3.92
Opportunities to be successful in course3.98
Luke Mayer 4 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Sivapathasund Parameswaran 34 median item responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

34 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.98
Course assignments facilitated learning3.73
Opportunities to be successful in course3.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.06
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.52
Timothy Taylor Maxwell 14 median item responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.79
Course assignments facilitated learning3.21
Opportunities to be successful in course3.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.08
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.00
Sam Al-Hashmi 16 median item responses 3.28Eval / 5
Overall3.28 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.65
Course assignments facilitated learning2.77
Opportunities to be successful in course3.02
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.47
Chang-Hsin Chen 12 median item responses 3.14Eval / 5
Overall3.14 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.71
Course assignments facilitated learning2.94
Opportunities to be successful in course3.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.19
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.25
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.