Course record MCOM

MCOM 5310

Strategic Communication Planning and Writing

Texas Tech University

1 section11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2015–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 11 of 11

Michael Zahn 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.35GPA
47.4% A
43.3% B
6.2% C
3.1% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Linda Daley 13 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.85
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Cynthia Buckle 14 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.36
Drew Brown 5 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.68
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.61
Andrew B. Brown 6 median item responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.85
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Jarvis C. Hebert 14 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.96
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.91
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.96
Kristi Gilmore 11 median item responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.91
Course assignments facilitated learning4.91
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.82
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.91
Jo Langston 9 median item responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.44
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.89
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Lindsay A. Grannan 5 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.20
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Mary Norman 15 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.72
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.81
Trenton Seltzer 13 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.68
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.72
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.