Course record MATH

MATH 4342

Mathematical Statistics I

Texas Tech University

1 section19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 19 of 19

Jingyong Su 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.35GPA
36.3% A
15.4% B
15.4% C
13.2% D
19.8% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Victor Shubov 11 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.36
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.82
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.82
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.73
Shan Sun 10 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.10
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.20
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Petros Ioanni Hadjicostas 20 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Adao Trindade 23 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.66
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.49
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
James Surles 25 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.03
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.85
Leif Ellingson 34 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

34 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.76
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.87
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.66
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Souparno Ghosh 17 median item responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Tommy Lu 25 median item responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course3.80
Nanwei Wang 18 median item responses 3.24Eval / 5
Overall3.24 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.00
Course assignments facilitated learning3.11
Opportunities to be successful in course3.61
Svetlozar Rachev 5 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.34
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.51
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
Hongwei Mei 7 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.28
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.51
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Fangyuan Zhang 18 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Jiho Park 9 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
William Conover 17 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.41
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Jeffrey Lee 11 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Dimitri Volchenkov 10 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Davide Lauria 23 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.48
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.52
Robert L Paige 17 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Summer I 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.