Course record MATH

MATH 3351

Higher Mathematics for Engineers and Scientists II

Texas Tech University

4 sections28 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score2/100
Needs work

Professors 28 of 28

Lance Drager 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.49GPA
19.0% A
30.0% B
38.0% C
8.0% D
5.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Luan Hoang 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.43GPA
23.2% A
26.8% B
28.0% C
13.4% D
8.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Linda Allen 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.20GPA
21.5% A
19.4% B
32.3% C
11.8% D
15.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kevin Long 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.00GPA
13.8% A
27.7% B
30.8% C
0.0% D
27.7% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jeffrey Lee 18 median item responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.74
Course assignments facilitated learning3.98
Opportunities to be successful in course3.81
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.34
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.19
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.71
Raegan Siwatu 15 median item responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.69
Course assignments facilitated learning3.36
Opportunities to be successful in course3.37
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.22
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.74
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.16
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.09
Amin Rahman 32 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Sophia Jang 19 median item responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.08
Opportunities to be successful in course3.64
Bijoy Ghosh 15 median item responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning3.55
Opportunities to be successful in course3.69
Razvan Gelca 2 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Wenjing Zhang 5 median item responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.20
Course assignments facilitated learning3.60
Opportunities to be successful in course3.60
Juntao Huang 13 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.85
Opportunities to be successful in course4.62
Wei Guo 11 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Katharine R. Long 16 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Ignacio Tomas 6 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.37
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.08
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.26
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.79
David Gilliam 15 median item responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.12
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.05
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.13
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.08
Wijesuriya Pubudu Dayawansa 16 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.56
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.44
Harold Dean Victory 8 median item responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning3.13
Opportunities to be successful in course3.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.13
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.88
Edward James Allen 19 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Ruey-Jen Jang 11 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.27
Brock Erwin 34 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

34 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Pushpi Paranamana 33 median item responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course3.97
Anthony Gruber 32 median item responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.56
Course assignments facilitated learning3.97
Opportunities to be successful in course3.53
Luigi Ferraro 17 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Arne Ledet 3 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Christopher Monico 14 median item responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.94
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.93
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Xiaochang Wang 19 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.16
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.05
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.26
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.32
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.26
David Weinberg 18 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.41
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.59
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.28
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.51
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.65
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.12
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 4

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

1 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.