Course record IS

IS 1100

Raiderready: Freshman Seminar

Texas Tech University

100 sections218 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2004–2019

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score79/100
Strong

Professors 218 of 218

Narissra Carter 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jordan Ryan 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Charles Crews 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Linda Donahue 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Gregory 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Laura Heinz 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Gerald Perrin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Denise Tijerina 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kumudumali Witanapatirana 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ann Willis 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kimberly Soulek 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Samuel Jackson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Patrick Hughes 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sandra Reeve 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sonia Moore 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.98GPA
97.9% A
2.1% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Vincent Sisneros 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.97GPA
97.0% A
3.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Catherine Duran 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.97GPA
97.0% A
3.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Connie Watson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.96GPA
96.9% A
3.1% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Linley Melhem 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.95GPA
94.4% A
5.6% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Juan Munoz 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.94GPA
94.0% A
6.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kenneth Griffith 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.94GPA
94.4% A
5.6% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jason Woodward 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.93GPA
96.0% A
2.0% B
2.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Wesley Condray 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.93GPA
93.0% A
7.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Shelby Kloiber 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.92GPA
91.3% A
8.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Karla Kitten 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.91GPA
93.7% A
4.2% B
2.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jeffrey Hays 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
91.7% A
6.3% B
2.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Vicky Mckenzie 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
90.0% A
10.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rebecca Fletcher 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.89GPA
94.0% A
0.0% B
6.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sarah Schwintz 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.89GPA
88.9% A
11.1% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Zahn 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
94.4% A
0.0% B
5.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Erik Book 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
87.1% A
12.9% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Catherine Nutter 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
94.7% A
0.0% B
3.2% C
2.1% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Samuel Hill 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
87.5% A
12.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rebecca Chapman 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.87GPA
93.0% A
0.0% B
7.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Russell Carter 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.86GPA
95.6% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
4.4% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Allison Cattell 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.83GPA
83.0% A
17.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rudolph Ritz 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.83GPA
89.6% A
8.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Loretta Bradley 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.83GPA
89.0% A
9.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Montague 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.82GPA
92.9% A
3.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Micah Logan 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
89.0% A
8.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Courtney Meyers 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
91.7% A
3.1% B
3.1% C
0.0% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Zach Manning 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
83.3% A
13.5% B
3.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ileana Hinojosa 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
84.0% A
14.0% B
0.0% C
2.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Heather Medley 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.80GPA
93.0% A
0.0% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Natalia Velikova 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.77GPA
80.6% A
15.1% B
4.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michelle Kiser 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
81.0% A
14.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Thomas Kimball 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
80.0% A
16.0% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Marsha Callender 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.75GPA
84.0% A
13.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Christine Self 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.75GPA
86.0% A
10.8% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Richard Watson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.73GPA
80.0% A
13.0% B
7.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jaclyn Cravens 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.73GPA
82.0% A
9.0% B
9.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Katie Ericson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.72GPA
85.1% A
7.9% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Paul Ruiz 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.72GPA
82.8% A
10.1% B
4.0% C
3.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Irina Drigalenko 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.72GPA
78.0% A
17.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kerri Pike 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.72GPA
84.0% A
4.0% B
12.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Tara Miller 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.71GPA
82.0% A
9.0% B
7.0% C
2.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rula Al-Hmoud 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.69GPA
92.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
8.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Chad Smith 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.69GPA
82.8% A
10.1% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Stacy Elliott 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.69GPA
88.0% A
6.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
6.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Maggie Gilchrest 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.68GPA
77.2% A
14.1% B
8.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Megan Ohlmann 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.67GPA
73.9% A
19.3% B
6.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Charles Dabbert 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.66GPA
80.8% A
10.1% B
7.1% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Casside Street 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.65GPA
91.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
9.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rachel Jackson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.65GPA
76.0% A
18.0% B
3.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Elizabeth Bertrand 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.65GPA
82.2% A
12.2% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
5.6% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Dena Haenchen 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.64GPA
71.7% A
21.2% B
7.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Peter Dotray 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.64GPA
73.6% A
21.8% B
2.3% C
0.0% D
2.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Brett Stine 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.62GPA
71.0% A
19.0% B
10.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Brandy Watson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.60GPA
87.0% A
0.0% B
3.0% C
7.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

William Lopez 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.59GPA
77.0% A
14.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
4.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ali Luempert 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.59GPA
77.0% A
10.0% B
10.0% C
2.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Angela Mazzolini 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.58GPA
65.9% A
26.4% B
7.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Dimitrios Pappas 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.58GPA
75.8% A
15.4% B
4.4% C
0.0% D
4.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mary Lagasse 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.58GPA
72.6% A
17.9% B
7.4% C
0.0% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Leo Eko 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.57GPA
64.0% A
29.0% B
7.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rob King 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.56GPA
70.0% A
22.0% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
4.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mukaddes Darwish 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.56GPA
72.0% A
22.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
6.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Suzanne Tapp 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.55GPA
73.0% A
18.0% B
0.0% C
9.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Aaron Yoshinobu 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.55GPA
81.0% A
0.0% B
9.5% C
9.5% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ryan Scheckel 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.53GPA
70.8% A
16.7% B
8.3% C
2.1% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kasondra Slaughter 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.52GPA
66.2% A
19.7% B
14.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Allison Matherly 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.50GPA
59.4% A
30.4% B
10.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Paul Frazier 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.47GPA
50.5% A
45.5% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Carman Campagna 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.47GPA
63.6% A
24.2% B
6.1% C
6.1% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jessica Spott 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.46GPA
66.3% A
20.7% B
8.7% C
0.0% D
4.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Helena Massengale 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.44GPA
64.4% A
20.8% B
12.9% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mark Webb 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.42GPA
58.0% A
27.0% B
15.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Erin Justyna 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.41GPA
71.0% A
11.0% B
11.0% C
2.0% D
5.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Misak Avetisyan 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.40GPA
60.0% A
30.0% B
0.0% C
10.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kanika Batra 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.35GPA
64.4% A
17.8% B
12.2% C
0.0% D
5.6% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Catherine Langford 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.33GPA
75.0% A
9.0% B
0.0% C
8.0% D
8.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Lauren Dent 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.33GPA
62.5% A
19.8% B
11.5% C
2.1% D
4.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Courtney Bray 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.31GPA
61.0% A
19.0% B
11.0% C
6.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Justin Louder 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.30GPA
61.0% A
22.0% B
9.0% C
4.0% D
4.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kimberly Simon Akins 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.28GPA
75.3% A
7.5% B
0.0% C
3.2% D
14.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Peter Keyel 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.23GPA
54.8% A
25.8% B
8.6% C
8.6% D
2.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Erika Bowles 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.20GPA
65.0% A
5.0% B
15.0% C
15.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Richard White 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.06GPA
53.0% A
12.0% B
29.0% C
0.0% D
6.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Allison Boye 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.97GPA
41.4% A
39.1% B
6.9% C
0.0% D
12.6% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rhonda Boros 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.93GPA
55.6% A
3.0% B
24.2% C
14.1% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

James Whitfield 6 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Blayne Alaniz 9 median item responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.91
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Michelle Hougland 7 median item responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Kasondra Garcia 23 median item responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning3.96
Opportunities to be successful in course3.30
Blayne Beal 17 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.39
Lyombe Eko 6 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Karlissa Black 10 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.87
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course3.96
Dimitri Pappas 9 median item responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Margaret Durham 12 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Jorge Iber 14 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.51
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.03
Raelin Randall 17 median item responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.36
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course3.96
Michael Holcomb 7 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Susanna Dickson 8 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course3.63
Hannah Bergren 10 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Sara Dennis 10 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.49
Course assignments facilitated learning4.24
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Kimberly C. Thornton 9 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
C. Richard Meek 16 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.19
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.63
Francisco Delgadillo 12 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Jeanne Donaldson 11 median item responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.91
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Andrew J. Stetson 6 median item responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.91
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Colleen Sisneros 9 median item responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Martin Binks 11 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.18
Shelley Ducatt 5 median item responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Laura Casanova 7 median item responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.95
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Brandi Schreiber 7 median item responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.02
Kyla Shannon 7 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Deborah Nichols 16 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.97
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course4.10
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.20
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.06
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.31
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.78
David Lawver 16 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.66
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.74
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Carl Lamp 13 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.23
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.77
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Bill Frank Dean 19 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.68
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.76
Delia O'Steen 10 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.31
Mitzi Lauderdale 12 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Mark Gring 16 median item responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Douglas Smith 8 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.63
Course assignments facilitated learning3.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.38
Cherif Mohamed Amor 15 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.47
Gerald Parr 19 median item responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.91
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.89
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.85
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.92
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Jeffrey Lee 10 median item responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.90
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.90
Jason Whiting 12 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning4.08
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.42
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Linda Jones 6 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Diane Nichols 15 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.07
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.07
Jeffrey Wheeler 17 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.35
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.37
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Barbara Morgan-Fleming 11 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.34
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.76
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.51
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.39
George Williams 9 median item responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.96
Course assignments facilitated learning4.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Ashley Gonzales 13 median item responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.15
Course assignments facilitated learning3.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.15
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.08
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.15
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.08
Dawn Zuerker 7 median item responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.86
Marijane Wernsman 10 median item responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.90
Course assignments facilitated learning3.80
Opportunities to be successful in course3.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.10
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.30
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.40
Elizabeth Gardner 11 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.18
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.89
Stephen Bayne 22 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.68
Course assignments facilitated learning4.77
Opportunities to be successful in course4.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.68
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.55
Tamara Mancini 5 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.97
Course assignments facilitated learning4.87
Opportunities to be successful in course4.35
Greg Gellene 22 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.84
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.97
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.95
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.87
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.90
Joshua Barron 13 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.85
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Katheline Randolph 13 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.77
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Rachel K Bobbitt 10 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.96
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.91
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.98
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
David Abercia 16 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.44
Jamie Cooper 11 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.64
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.27
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.36
Tonya Ward 17 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.91
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.91
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.64
Nicole Wesley 7 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Tamara Mcclain 9 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.89
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Marla Britton-Johnson 22 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course3.59
Elizabeth Melton 13 median item responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Jacquelyn Manz 9 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.93
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Ryan Gibbs 21 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Janessa Walls 19 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.95
Course assignments facilitated learning4.95
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Robert Stewart 8 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Keri Shiplet 8 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Katie Wiskow 8 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Brad Dabbert 10 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.85
Opportunities to be successful in course4.49
Cathe Nutter 9 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Rashid Al Hmoud 16 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Russell Lackey 11 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Elizabeth Massengale 14 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Adam Alaniz 14 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.12
Stefanie Borst 7 median item responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.16
Vince Sisneros 8 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.11
Becky Fletcher 5 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course3.40
Alyssa Boren 11 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Mary Cram 12 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.46
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Donell Callender 9 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.91
Course assignments facilitated learning4.78
Opportunities to be successful in course4.34
Jeff Hays 11 median item responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Jessica Simpson 6 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.17
Stefan Altheide 8 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Kymberli Saldana 11 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.91
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Morgan D. Brannon 15 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Beth Thacker 14 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Victor M. Mellinger 17 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Carla G Burrus 13 median item responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.41
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course3.69
Conrad Lyford 16 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course3.83
Sipra Eko 10 median item responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Ben Montecillo 15 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.81
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Jerry Parr 12 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Missy Buxkemper 15 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.93
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Alec Cattell 14 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Robert Cox 14 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Diana Wilkinson 14 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.68
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Alex Saulnier Mckinin 13 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Ali Duffy 9 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Abed Monawar 12 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Jon Mcnaughtan 15 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Bret Hendricks 10 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Marcus Graham 13 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.85
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
John Shelton 14 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course3.71
Rustyroger David 17 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.76
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Andrew T. Vanderpool 16 median item responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.96
Course assignments facilitated learning4.97
Opportunities to be successful in course4.68
Ronny Wall 17 median item responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Tanya Calamoneri 18 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.94
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Ashley N. Penner 10 median item responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.90
Julia Witt 14 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Karen Thompson 14 median item responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course3.57
Ellen S. Rose 6 median item responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Mellinee Lesley 16 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.91
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Kenneth Gassiot 21 median item responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.76
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.95
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.82
Philip Morton 7 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.86
Marcus Tanner 19 median item responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.08
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.09
Juliann Christine Scholl 18 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.61
Amy Murphy 22 median item responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.91
Opportunities to be successful in course4.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.97
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.97
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.92
Shane Blum 17 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.94
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.94
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Theodore Wiesner 14 median item responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.07
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.14
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Molly Dickens 17 median item responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.