Course record IE

IE 2311

Computing for Industrial Engineers

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2013–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 16 of 16

Leonidas Javier Guadalupe Herrera 29 median item responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.99
Course assignments facilitated learning3.71
Opportunities to be successful in course3.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.99
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.31
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.56
Amanda Baty 32 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.60
Stephen Peterson 25 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.37
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.28
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.45
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.47
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.31
Manish Ranjit 25 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Katharina Renken 40 median item responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

40 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.01
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
John Carrell 19 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.31
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.41
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.24
Dan Mcgrath 19 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Hamidreza Validi 40 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

40 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.49
Course assignments facilitated learning4.34
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Juan Carlos Rojas Fernandez 4 median item responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.66
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.05
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.29
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.01
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.05
Timothy Matis 3 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Feri Afrinaldi 37 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

37 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.66
Sarah Asio 25 median item responses 3.09Eval / 5
Overall3.09 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.28
Course assignments facilitated learning3.13
Opportunities to be successful in course3.01
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content2.98
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.05
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.30
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.53
Nazanin Naderi 7 median item responses 3.52Eval / 5
Overall3.52 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.85
Course assignments facilitated learning3.84
Opportunities to be successful in course3.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.98
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.05
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.95
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.43
James Oler 45 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

45 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.90
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.93
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.93
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.85
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Kaveh Sheikhrezaei 22 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Jeffrey Hanson 9 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.52
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

2 more syllabi

Spring 2025 · Section C01

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.