Course record ENTX
ENTX 6100
Graduate Seminar
2 sections14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2005–2024
Flunk Score90/100
ExcellentKamaleshwar Singh 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.85 / 5
7 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.90
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.89
Degeng Wang 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.33 / 5
9 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.03
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Phil Smith 10 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
10 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Jonathan David Maul 7 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
7 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.68
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Weimin Gao 7 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
7 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.93
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.93
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.93
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.84
Christopher Joseph Salice 25 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
25 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course3.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.47
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.59
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.96
Burnella Gentles 7 median item responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
7 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Philip Smith 6 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
6 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Todd Anderson 11 median item responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
11 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.91
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.91
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.91
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.91
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.82
Michael John Hooper 7 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
7 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Celine Godard 11 median item responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
11 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.91
Course assignments facilitated learning4.18
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.09
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.45
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.18
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.27
Stephen Cox 13 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
13 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.46
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.38
Gregory Mayer 7 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
7 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.79
Lenka Halamkova 4 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
4 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.