Course record ECE

ECE 3301

General Electrical Engineering

Texas Tech University

7 sections26 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2010–2026
Flunk Score38/100
Below average

Professors 26 of 26

Michael Giesselmann 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.55GPA
63.5% A
27.1% B
9.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jie Zhao 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.26GPA
50.0% A
30.2% B
15.6% C
4.2% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Golnaz Moallem 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.22GPA
50.0% A
26.1% B
19.6% C
4.3% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rajnish Kumar 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.18GPA
52.8% A
23.6% B
12.4% C
11.2% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Yao Tang 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.12GPA
47.7% A
26.1% B
19.3% C
3.4% D
3.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Samuel Storrs 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.90GPA
41.1% A
25.6% B
20.0% C
7.8% D
5.6% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ronald Cox 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.73GPA
37.2% A
26.9% B
19.2% C
5.1% D
11.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mohammad Maqusi 13 median item responses 2.69Eval / 5
Overall2.69 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.38
Course assignments facilitated learning1.54
Opportunities to be successful in course1.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives1.62
Justin Talavera 11 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.66
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
William Ray 21 median item responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course3.72
Animesh Chowdhury 26 median item responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.96
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course3.42
Behnam Askarian 23 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.36
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course3.91
Zhaoyang Fan 24 median item responses 3.12Eval / 5
Overall3.12 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.93
Course assignments facilitated learning3.62
Opportunities to be successful in course2.81
Boker Agili Agili 25 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.41
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.48
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Kamrul Foysal 17 median item responses 2.17Eval / 5
Overall2.17 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized1.94
Course assignments facilitated learning2.29
Opportunities to be successful in course2.29
Ben Esser 8 median item responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Boker O. Agili 11 median item responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.04
Course assignments facilitated learning3.49
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.49
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.34
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.48
Ayrton Bernussi 4 median item responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.50
Tooraj Nikoubin Boroujeni 11 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Subrina Noureen 10 median item responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course3.47
Richard Gale 9 median item responses 2.56Eval / 5
Overall2.56 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.33
Course assignments facilitated learning2.67
Opportunities to be successful in course2.67
Dhanya Nair 30 median item responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning4.07
Opportunities to be successful in course3.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.03
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.37
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.60
Robert Koven 30 median item responses 2.70Eval / 5
Overall2.70 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.20
Course assignments facilitated learning3.27
Opportunities to be successful in course2.63
Miao He 20 median item responses 3.33Eval / 5
Overall3.33 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.35
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.15
Sergey Nikishin 16 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.19
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.13
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
Seyed Mahdi Ghamkhari 40 median item responses 3.24Eval / 5
Overall3.24 / 5

40 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.33
Course assignments facilitated learning3.19
Opportunities to be successful in course3.87
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.10
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.15
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.04
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.02
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.21
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.