Course record CS

CS 3383

Theory of Automata

Texas Tech University

3 sections18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average

Professors 18 of 18

Joseph Rushton 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.21GPA
39.3% A
42.7% B
18.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Edward Wertz 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.89GPA
41.0% A
26.0% B
22.0% C
4.0% D
7.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Gelfond 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.73GPA
32.9% A
30.6% B
20.0% C
7.1% D
9.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Richard Watson 21 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.66
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.47
Yuanlin Zhang 19 median item responses 3.23Eval / 5
Overall3.23 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.10
Course assignments facilitated learning3.28
Opportunities to be successful in course2.95
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.39
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.85
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.05
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.74
Eric J. Rees 24 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Amanda Videtich 25 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.16
Course assignments facilitated learning4.51
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.41
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.26
Parvaneh Shayegh-Boroujeni 12 median item responses 3.58Eval / 5
Overall3.58 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.58
Course assignments facilitated learning3.58
Opportunities to be successful in course3.58
Josh Archer 14 median item responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.28
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.13
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.98
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.48
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Gopal D. Lakhani 16 median item responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning3.94
Opportunities to be successful in course3.94
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.19
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.53
Evgenii Balai 28 median item responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.61
Course assignments facilitated learning3.68
Opportunities to be successful in course3.61
Neda Tavakoli 26 median item responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.81
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.96
Jose Mario Carranza Rojas 5 median item responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Adrian Lara 16 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.81
Rattikorn Hewett 24 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.24
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.26
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.34
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.04
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.01
Lin Chen 25 median item responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.29
Course assignments facilitated learning3.92
Opportunities to be successful in course3.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.93
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.11
Lu Wei 28 median item responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.49
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.30
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.04
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.07
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Ziwen Pan 62 median item responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

62 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.05
Opportunities to be successful in course4.06
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.03
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.89
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.85
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.