Course record CS

CS 3365

Software Engineering

Texas Tech University

4 sections15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average

Professors 15 of 15

Pushkar Ogale 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.25GPA
40.6% A
43.6% B
15.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Eonsuk Shin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.97GPA
31.3% A
34.3% B
34.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Susan Mengel 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.94GPA
32.0% A
38.0% B
24.0% C
3.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sepideh Ghanavati 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.83GPA
21.0% A
45.0% B
29.0% C
5.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Moitrayee Chatterje 37 median item responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

37 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.81
Course assignments facilitated learning4.03
Opportunities to be successful in course3.84
Jeffrey Zheng 33 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Don T. Pathirage 29 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.44
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.37
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.39
Juan Esquivel Rodriguez 9 median item responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning3.56
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.22
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.11
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.22
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.89
Eduardo Colmenares Diaz 11 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.64
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Akalanka Bandara Mailew Dissanayaka Mohottalalaga 16 median item responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Tadeo Judas 24 median item responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.13
Course assignments facilitated learning3.71
Opportunities to be successful in course3.58
Marcelo Jenkins 3 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Maaz Amjad 37 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

37 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.51
Opportunities to be successful in course4.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.78
Michael W Sobolewski 13 median item responses 3.36Eval / 5
Overall3.36 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.01
Course assignments facilitated learning2.83
Opportunities to be successful in course2.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.98
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.39
Akbar Siami Namin 22 median item responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.31
Course assignments facilitated learning3.68
Opportunities to be successful in course3.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.87
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.15
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.97
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.61
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 9

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
6 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Pathirage, Don

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Pathirage, Don

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.