Course record CS

CS 2365

Object-Oriented Programming

Texas Tech University

3 sections19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score60/100
Strong

Professors 19 of 19

Jerry Perez 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.68GPA
77.8% A
19.2% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Nahid Farhady Ghalaty 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.42GPA
58.0% A
26.0% B
16.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Richard Watson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.22GPA
54.0% A
26.0% B
11.0% C
7.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Susan Mengel 36 median item responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

36 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning4.10
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.22
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.29
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.96
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.31
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.66
Eonsuk Shin 19 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course3.98
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.94
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.08
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.12
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.22
Zhenkai Zhang 27 median item responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.18
Mario Albert Pitalua-Rodriguez 23 median item responses 3.51Eval / 5
Overall3.51 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.86
Course assignments facilitated learning3.17
Opportunities to be successful in course3.32
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.72
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.89
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.14
Mustafa N. Alam 30 median item responses 3.08Eval / 5
Overall3.08 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.11
Course assignments facilitated learning3.51
Opportunities to be successful in course3.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content2.98
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.78
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.90
Jose Mario Carranza Rojas 6 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Scott R. Franklin 52 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

52 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.65
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.59
Prerit Datta 8 median item responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.75
Course assignments facilitated learning3.75
Opportunities to be successful in course3.63
Chang Liu 9 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Sayed Erfan Arefin 6 median item responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Richard Matovu 9 median item responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.44
Course assignments facilitated learning3.78
Opportunities to be successful in course3.44
Elham Hojati 12 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Tadeo Judas 17 median item responses 3.24Eval / 5
Overall3.24 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.12
Course assignments facilitated learning3.41
Opportunities to be successful in course3.18
Zulfiqar Khan 48 median item responses 1.71Eval / 5
Overall1.71 / 5

48 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized1.54
Course assignments facilitated learning1.96
Opportunities to be successful in course1.63
Don T. Pathirage 13 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.77
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Arturo Camacho 7 median item responses 2.70Eval / 5
Overall2.70 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.86
Course assignments facilitated learning2.29
Opportunities to be successful in course3.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content2.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.00
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 9

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

6 more syllabi

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.