Course record CHEM

CHEM 5101

Seminar

Texas Tech University

8 sections28 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2014–2025
Flunk Score93/100
Excellent

Professors 28 of 28

Jonathan Thompson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Andrew Harned 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Joachim Weber 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

William Nes 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Huazhong Shi 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.86GPA
86.0% A
14.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Mayer 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.86GPA
86.0% A
14.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Bruce Whittlesey 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.80GPA
80.0% A
20.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Carol Korzeniewski 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.73GPA
80.0% A
13.0% B
7.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Edward Quitevis 6 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Gerardo Gamez Goytia 11 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Achim Weber 5 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
David Birney 10 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Mike Latham 16 median item responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.94
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Michael Findlater 13 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Bill Poirier 7 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Benjamin Wylie 12 median item responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Kristin Hutchins 12 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Greg Gellene 3 median item responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Anthony Cozzolino 4 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Haibo Ge 11 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.27
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Elka R. Georgieva 16 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.28
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.44
Hans Lischka 5 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.90
Opportunities to be successful in course4.90
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.80
Ruibin Liang 12 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Annie Gorden 13 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.77
John D. Gorden 5 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.80
Adam W. Smith 19 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Samantha L. Kristufek 9 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.37
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.44
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.44
Joshua Tropp 13 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.54
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.62
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.