Course record MGMT

MGMT 373

Managing Human Resources

Texas A & M University-College Station

1,210 grades56 sections21 professors
Grades: 2014–2019

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score41/100
Mixed record

Professors 21 of 21

S Saladino 81 grades · 4 terms · 2015–2019 3.78GPA
77.8% A
22.2% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

81 letter grades · 4 sections · 2015–2019

Compare with the course
Saladino vs. the course average
A +27.0
B −21.5
C −5.0
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Summer 2015Summer 2019

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 81 enrolled.

J Koopman 140 grades · 3 terms · 2018–2019 3.67GPA
69.3% A
28.6% B
2.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

140 letter grades · 6 sections · 2018–2019

Compare with the course
Koopman vs. the course average
A +18.5
B −15.1
C −2.8
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 140 enrolled.

T Morgan 67 grades · 3 terms · 2016–2018 3.51GPA
56.7% A
37.3% B
6.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

67 letter grades · 3 sections · 2016–2018

Compare with the course
Morgan vs. the course average
A +5.9
B −6.4
C +1.0
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 2 of 69 enrolled.

M Call 136 grades · 2 terms · 2017–2018 3.50GPA
53.7% A
42.6% B
3.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

136 letter grades · 6 sections · 2017–2018

Compare with the course
Call vs. the course average
A +2.9
B −1.1
C −1.3
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 136 enrolled.

D Sullivan 44 grades · 2 terms · 2019 3.41GPA
47.7% A
45.5% B
6.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

44 letter grades · 2 sections · 2019

Compare with the course
Sullivan vs. the course average
A −3.1
B +1.7
C +1.9
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 44 enrolled.

J Yim 44 grades · 2 terms · 2019 3.39GPA
43.2% A
52.3% B
4.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

44 letter grades · 2 sections · 2019

Compare with the course
Yim vs. the course average
A −7.6
B +8.6
C −0.4
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 1 of 45 enrolled.

D Hargrove 39 grades · 2 terms · 2014–2015 3.38GPA
46.2% A
46.2% B
7.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

39 letter grades · 2 sections · 2014–2015

Compare with the course
Hargrove vs. the course average
A −4.7
B +2.4
C +2.7
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 39 enrolled.

T Smith 79 grades · 2 terms · 2014–2015 3.38GPA
43.0% A
51.9% B
5.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

79 letter grades · 4 sections · 2014–2015

Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A −7.8
B +8.2
C +0.1
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 79 enrolled.

J Wang 105 grades · 3 terms · 2014–2016 3.37GPA
40.0% A
57.1% B
2.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

105 letter grades · 5 sections · 2014–2016

Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A −10.8
B +13.4
C −2.1
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 105 enrolled.

K Newman 47 grades · 2 terms · 2016 3.32GPA
46.8% A
38.3% B
14.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

47 letter grades · 2 sections · 2016

Compare with the course
Newman vs. the course average
A −4.0
B −5.4
C +9.9
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 47 enrolled.

S Mcclean 66 grades · 3 terms · 2017–2018 3.32GPA
40.9% A
54.5% B
1.5% C
1.5% D
1.5% F

66 letter grades · 3 sections · 2017–2018

Compare with the course
Mcclean vs. the course average
A −9.9
B +10.8
C −3.4
D +1.4
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.5% withdrew · 1 of 67 enrolled.

T Thundiyil 79 grades · 2 terms · 2014 3.28GPA
35.4% A
59.5% B
3.8% C
0.0% D
1.3% F

79 letter grades · 4 sections · 2014

Compare with the course
Thundiyil vs. the course average
A −15.4
B +15.8
C −1.2
D −0.1
F +0.9

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 79 enrolled.

G Thurgood 115 grades · 3 terms · 2014–2016 3.25GPA
36.5% A
52.2% B
11.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

115 letter grades · 5 sections · 2014–2016

Compare with the course
Thurgood vs. the course average
A −14.3
B +8.5
C +6.3
D −0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 115 enrolled.

L Jones 22 grades · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.68GPA
68.2% A
31.8% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

22 letter grades · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.

B Rivera 21 grades · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.62GPA
76.2% A
19.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
4.8% F

21 letter grades · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.

S Mistry 22 grades · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.50GPA
50.0% A
50.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

22 letter grades · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.

M Prengler 22 grades · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.41GPA
50.0% A
40.9% B
9.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

22 letter grades · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.

R Chandler 18 grades · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.39GPA
38.9% A
61.1% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

18 letter grades · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.

W Boswell 22 grades · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.36GPA
50.0% A
36.4% B
13.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

22 letter grades · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.

K Griffin 21 grades · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.29GPA
42.9% A
42.9% B
14.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

21 letter grades · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.

Y Lee 20 grades · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.20GPA
55.0% A
30.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
10.0% F

20 letter grades · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample

9.1% withdrew · 2 of 22 enrolled.

Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.