Course record SPAN
SPAN 2001
Intermediate Spanish I
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
145 sections14 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record
Julie Martin 4 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2024 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Martin vs. the course average
A
+14.1
B
−12.4
C
−1.5
D
−0.5
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.88 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.69
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.89
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.94
Assignment measured knowledge4.46
Instructor stimulates interest4.74
Mirla Gonzalez 11 sections · 9 terms · 2019–2025 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Gonzalez vs. the course average
A
+12.6
B
−10.9
C
−1.7
D
+0.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Summer 2025
Overall4.30 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.87
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.27
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.37
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.53
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest3.93
Melissa Pilkington 39 sections · 20 terms · 2013–2022 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 39 sections · 2013–2022
Compare with the course
Pilkington vs. the course average
A
+12.7
B
−11.0
C
−1.8
D
−0.2
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Spring 2022
Overall4.86 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.28
Instructor clarity4.82
Course effectiveness4.74
Instructor enthusiasm4.94
Instructor helpfulness4.74
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.89
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.96
Assignment measured knowledge4.62
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Adele Douglin 2 sections · 1 term · 2021 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021
Compare with the course
Douglin vs. the course average
A
+14.3
B
−15.0
C
−0.5
D
+2.1
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.51 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Miguel Rosas Buendia 3 sections · 3 terms · 2019–2023 3.80GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019–2023
Compare with the course
Buendia vs. the course average
A
+9.3
B
−6.5
C
−3.6
D
−0.5
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.91 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Danielle Geary 12 sections · 7 terms · 2017–2025 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Geary vs. the course average
A
+8.7
B
−7.7
C
−1.0
D
−0.1
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2017Fall 2025
Overall4.64 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.11
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.62
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.69
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.69
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.36
Caroline Machado 6 sections · 4 terms · 2021–2022 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2021–2022
Compare with the course
Machado vs. the course average
A
+10.5
B
−11.6
C
−0.6
D
−0.5
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2021Fall 2022
Overall4.82 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.32
Instructor clarity4.78
Course effectiveness4.56
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.68
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Antonio Cardentey 9 sections · 5 terms · 2019–2025 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Cardentey vs. the course average
A
+1.3
B
−2.6
C
−1.5
D
+1.1
F
+1.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.50 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.96
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.18
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.41
Instructor availability4.66
Instructor communication4.61
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.41
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest4.18
Delia Tyler 27 sections · 13 terms · 2010–2018 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 27 sections · 2010–2018
Compare with the course
Tyler vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
+7.0
C
+2.5
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Fall 2018
Overall4.59 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.32
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.57
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.44
Instructor availability4.52
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge4.51
Instructor stimulates interest4.51
Kelly Comfort 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2013 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2013
Compare with the course
Comfort vs. the course average
A
−16.6
B
+19.1
C
−1.2
D
−0.5
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.58 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
David Shook 12 sections · 11 terms · 2010–2020 3.52GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2010–2020
Compare with the course
Shook vs. the course average
A
−22.2
B
+24.8
C
−1.2
D
−0.5
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Spring 2020
Overall4.81 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.22
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.46
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.56
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Laura Rios 11 sections · 7 terms · 2012–2017 3.52GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2012–2017
Compare with the course
Rios vs. the course average
A
−20.8
B
+22.0
C
−0.2
D
same
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2012Spring 2017
Overall4.52 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.06
Instructor clarity4.38
Course effectiveness4.34
Instructor enthusiasm4.74
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.44
Instructor communication4.51
Instructor effectiveness4.52
Instructor respectfulness4.69
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.34
Ana Cruz 4 sections · 2 terms · 2011 2.84GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011
Compare with the course
Cruz vs. the course average
A
−54.0
B
+24.7
C
+27.5
D
+1.0
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Yesim Ozbarlas 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.