Course record PSYC
PSYC 2020
Psychological Statistics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
39 sections11 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score13/100
Needs work
Zachary Tidler 6 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Tidler vs. the course average
A
+42.9
B
−27.9
C
−10.8
D
−2.4
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2022Summer 2025
Overall4.82 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.82
Instructor enthusiasm4.78
Instructor helpfulness4.68
Instructor availability4.97
Instructor communication4.98
Instructor effectiveness4.94
Instructor respectfulness4.94
Assignment measured knowledge4.82
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Mark Himmelstein 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Himmelstein vs. the course average
A
+25.2
B
−17.0
C
−4.0
D
−2.4
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.87 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.41
Instructor clarity4.87
Course effectiveness4.81
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.89
Instructor communication4.97
Instructor effectiveness4.89
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.68
Instructor stimulates interest4.63
Rebecca George 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2023 3.43GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2023
Compare with the course
George vs. the course average
A
+4.8
B
−2.5
C
−2.7
D
−0.4
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.60 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.62
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.54
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.66
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.14
Instructor stimulates interest4.24
Eunbee Kim 4 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 3.34GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
−3.1
B
+4.3
C
−0.5
D
−1.4
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2022Summer 2025
Overall3.63 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.41
Instructor clarity2.96
Course effectiveness3.77
Instructor enthusiasm3.27
Instructor helpfulness3.56
Instructor availability4.34
Instructor communication3.96
Instructor effectiveness3.72
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.38
Instructor stimulates interest3.04
Davood Tofighi 3 sections · 3 terms · 2013–2016 3.30GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2013–2016
Compare with the course
Tofighi vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
+0.7
C
−4.2
D
+2.4
F
+1.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.31 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest3.65
Daniel Spieler 11 sections · 11 terms · 2011–2021 2.99GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2011–2021
Compare with the course
Spieler vs. the course average
A
−21.0
B
+10.4
C
+6.9
D
+2.5
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Spring 2021
Overall3.52 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.88
Instructor clarity2.94
Course effectiveness3.54
Instructor enthusiasm4.48
Instructor helpfulness3.12
Instructor availability3.94
Instructor communication3.48
Instructor effectiveness3.27
Instructor respectfulness3.84
Assignment measured knowledge3.53
Instructor stimulates interest3.04
Dingjing Shi 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Meghan Babcock 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.72GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.92 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Jordan Sparks 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.55 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Christopher Hertzog 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.82GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall3.84 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Michael Hunter 31 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.04
Course effectiveness4.08
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.06
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.28
Instructor effectiveness4.32
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.82
Instructor stimulates interest4.04
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.