Course record PSYC
PSYC 2015
Research Methods
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
52 sections24 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Zachary Tidler 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2024 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Tidler vs. the course average
A
+24.4
B
−19.2
C
−3.5
D
−0.8
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.72 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.88
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge3.96
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Eunbee Kim 3 sections · 3 terms · 2024–2025 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
+7.5
B
−1.1
C
−4.7
D
−0.8
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Meghan Babcock 15 sections · 10 terms · 2018–2021 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 15 sections · 2018–2021
Compare with the course
Babcock vs. the course average
A
+6.7
B
−1.7
C
−3.5
D
−0.8
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2018Summer 2021
Overall4.87 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity4.89
Course effectiveness4.62
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.52
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Matthew Barrett 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016 3.66GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Barrett vs. the course average
A
+9.3
B
−8.2
C
−0.4
D
−0.8
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.58 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest3.85
Qiliang He 3 sections · 2 terms · 2022 3.53GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022
Compare with the course
He vs. the course average
A
+6.8
B
−6.5
C
−4.7
D
+0.5
F
+3.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.66 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Angela Yoo 3 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2022 3.37GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2022
Compare with the course
Yoo vs. the course average
A
−14.9
B
+12.9
C
+1.3
D
+0.2
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.69 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.22
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Eric Stearman 4 sections · 4 terms · 2013–2017 3.27GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2013–2017
Compare with the course
Stearman vs. the course average
A
−19.6
B
+10.3
C
+8.9
D
+1.3
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Spring 2017
Overall4.38 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.22
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.47
Instructor effectiveness4.42
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.03
Francis Durso 5 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2012 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Durso vs. the course average
A
−36.5
B
+20.4
C
+14.4
D
+1.5
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.59 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Emanuel Rojas 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Jamie Gorman 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.78 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Lauren Margulieux 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.61 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Rebecca George 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.47 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.01
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.71
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.62
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge3.88
Instructor stimulates interest3.58
Rick Thomas 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.67 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.73
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest4.43
Julia Harrison 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.81GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Jason Tsukahara 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.68 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.58
Instructor enthusiasm4.59
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.46
Raquel Hodge 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.83 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Thackery Brown 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.28 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.52
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness3.95
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.17
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge3.88
Instructor stimulates interest3.23
Kelsey Merlo 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.80 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Kate Kidwell 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.67 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.35
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Shivangi Jain 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.27GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.51 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness3.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Erika Fulton 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.14GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.45 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Na Liu 9 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Maugan Lloyd 21 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Justin Sabree 26 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.