Course record MUSI
MUSI 7100
Music Technology Research Laboratory
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
189 sections14 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score62/100
Strong
Christopher Moore 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2015 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2015
Compare with the course
Moore vs. the course average
A
+17.0
B
−14.4
C
−2.3
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Alexander Cohen 3 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2023 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2023
Compare with the course
Cohen vs. the course average
A
+17.0
B
−14.4
C
−2.3
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Henrik Von Coler 4 sections · 4 terms · 2024–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Coler vs. the course average
A
+17.0
B
−14.4
C
−2.3
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2024Fall 2025
Parag Chordia 5 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2012 3.96GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2010–2012
Compare with the course
Chordia vs. the course average
A
+13.0
B
−10.4
C
−2.3
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.26 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.17
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability3.93
Instructor communication3.77
Instructor effectiveness4.17
Instructor respectfulness4.27
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Nathaniel Condit-Schultz 14 sections · 11 terms · 2020–2025 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Condit-Schultz vs. the course average
A
+12.0
B
−9.4
C
−2.3
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Fall 2025
Overall4.97 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Alexandria Smith 8 sections · 5 terms · 2023–2025 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+14.5
B
−14.4
C
+0.2
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2023Fall 2025
Overall4.96 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Claire Arthur 15 sections · 15 terms · 2018–2025 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 15 sections · 2018–2025
Compare with the course
Arthur vs. the course average
A
+7.8
B
−6.1
C
−1.5
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2025
Overall4.90 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.85
Instructor clarity4.93
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.93
Gil Weinberg 38 sections · 31 terms · 2010–2025 3.86GPA
Published grade shares · 38 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Weinberg vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
−2.2
C
−1.3
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2025
Overall4.37 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.29
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.59
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.39
Instructor respectfulness4.46
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Sylvain Le Groux 2 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2013 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012–2013
Compare with the course
Groux vs. the course average
A
+8.5
B
−14.4
C
+6.2
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Grace Leslie 8 sections · 8 terms · 2018–2022 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2018–2022
Compare with the course
Leslie vs. the course average
A
+4.3
B
−6.0
C
+1.9
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Spring 2022
Overall4.90 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.53
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Timothy Hsu 10 sections · 10 terms · 2013–2018 3.72GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2013–2018
Compare with the course
Hsu vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+2.2
C
+3.5
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Spring 2018
Overall4.15 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity3.96
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.22
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.52
Instructor communication3.93
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.38
Assignment measured knowledge3.63
Instructor stimulates interest3.77
Alexander Lerch 31 sections · 25 terms · 2013–2025 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 31 sections · 2013–2025
Compare with the course
Lerch vs. the course average
A
−8.2
B
+6.0
C
+2.1
D
+0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2025
Overall4.75 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.76
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.73
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.76
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge4.59
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Jason Freeman 48 sections · 31 terms · 2010–2025 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 48 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Freeman vs. the course average
A
−10.8
B
+10.1
C
+0.2
D
+0.3
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2025
Overall4.86 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.72
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.77
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.92
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.61
Instructor stimulates interest4.76
Jeffrey Albert 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.