Course record ME

ME 4056

Mechanical Engineering Systems Laboratory

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

351 sections16 professors
Grades: 2013–2025Evaluations: 2013–2024
Flunk Score17/100
Needs work

Professors 16 of 16

Caitlin Leksana 10 sections · 1 term · 2017 3.69GPA
69.2% A
30.8% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2017

Compare with the course
Leksana vs. the course average
A +20.1
B −15.0
C −4.7
D −0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Samuel Graham 19 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.63GPA
64.1% A
35.0% B
0.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 19 sections · 2016–2017

Compare with the course
Graham vs. the course average
A +15.0
B −10.7
C −3.8
D −0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Karim Sabra 8 sections · 1 term · 2014 3.63GPA
63.0% A
37.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2014

Compare with the course
Sabra vs. the course average
A +13.9
B −8.8
C −4.7
D −0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Matthew Perrella 17 sections · 2 terms · 2017 3.62GPA
62.0% A
37.5% B
0.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 17 sections · 2017

Compare with the course
Perrella vs. the course average
A +13.0
B −8.3
C −4.2
D −0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Aldo Ferri 19 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2017 3.60GPA
60.6% A
39.0% B
0.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 19 sections · 2014–2017

Compare with the course
Ferri vs. the course average
A +11.5
B −6.8
C −4.2
D −0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Stephen Johnston 12 sections · 1 term · 2019 3.55GPA
61.4% A
33.0% B
4.9% C
0.7% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2019

Compare with the course
Johnston vs. the course average
A +12.3
B −12.8
C +0.2
D +0.4
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

David Torello 63 sections · 7 terms · 2018–2025 3.52GPA
57.1% A
38.2% B
4.3% C
0.3% D
0.1% F

Published grade shares · 63 sections · 2018–2025

Compare with the course
Torello vs. the course average
A +8.0
B −7.6
C −0.4
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2018Spring 2025
David Macnair 25 sections · 16 terms · 2015–2025 3.46GPA
52.2% A
42.4% B
4.7% C
0.6% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 25 sections · 2015–2025

Compare with the course
Macnair vs. the course average
A +3.1
B −3.4
C +0.1
D +0.3
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2015Fall 2025
Philip Varney 9 sections · 1 term · 2016 3.41GPA
48.1% A
46.4% B
4.6% C
0.0% D
0.9% F

Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2016

Compare with the course
Varney vs. the course average
A −1.0
B +0.7
C −0.1
D −0.3
F +0.7

Difference in percentage points.

Michael Baldwin 36 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2019 3.39GPA
45.6% A
48.5% B
5.6% C
0.0% D
0.3% F

Published grade shares · 36 sections · 2018–2019

Compare with the course
Baldwin vs. the course average
A −3.5
B +2.7
C +1.0
D −0.3
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

Zhuomin Zhang 39 sections · 5 terms · 2013–2016 3.33GPA
40.2% A
53.5% B
5.8% C
0.2% D
0.3% F

Published grade shares · 39 sections · 2013–2016

Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A −8.8
B +7.7
C +1.1
D −0.1
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Summer 2016
Peter Rogers 18 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2014 3.24GPA
36.7% A
52.0% B
9.7% C
1.6% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 18 sections · 2013–2014

Compare with the course
Rogers vs. the course average
A −12.4
B +6.2
C +5.1
D +1.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

F. Degertekin 22 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2016 3.13GPA
20.1% A
74.1% B
5.3% C
0.0% D
0.5% F

Published grade shares · 22 sections · 2015–2016

Compare with the course
Degertekin vs. the course average
A −28.9
B +28.3
C +0.6
D −0.3
F +0.3

Difference in percentage points.

Yogendra Joshi 32 sections · 3 terms · 2014–2016 3.13GPA
22.8% A
67.6% B
9.3% C
0.3% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 32 sections · 2014–2016

Compare with the course
Joshi vs. the course average
A −26.2
B +21.8
C +4.6
D same
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

David Smith 7 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.94
Instructor helpfulness4.06
Instructor availability4.76
Instructor communication4.81
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.34
Instructor stimulates interest4.66
Nader Sadegh 7 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.72
Instructor enthusiasm4.08
Instructor helpfulness4.02
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication3.82
Instructor effectiveness3.56
Instructor respectfulness4.46
Instructor stimulates interest3.08
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.