Course record ME
ME 3017
System Dynamics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
159 sections23 professors
Grades: 2013–2025Evaluations: 2013–2024
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work
Jacob Blevins 2 sections · 2 terms · 2025 3.81GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Blevins vs. the course average
A
+38.3
B
−16.8
C
−13.8
D
−5.0
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Shreyas Kousik 6 sections · 6 terms · 2023–2025 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Kousik vs. the course average
A
+34.1
B
−15.1
C
−11.7
D
−5.2
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2023Fall 2025
Overall4.93 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.77
Instructor clarity4.93
Course effectiveness4.91
Instructor enthusiasm4.98
Instructor helpfulness4.84
Instructor availability4.93
Instructor communication4.92
Instructor effectiveness4.98
Instructor respectfulness4.98
Assignment measured knowledge4.69
Instructor stimulates interest4.91
Yusuf Yaras 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Yaras vs. the course average
A
+32.5
B
−11.5
C
−14.1
D
−5.5
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Yun Song 2 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2016 3.44GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Song vs. the course average
A
+17.7
B
−6.0
C
−11.3
D
+2.1
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.84 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.45
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
David Torello 2 sections · 1 term · 2017 3.41GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017
Compare with the course
Torello vs. the course average
A
+2.2
B
+13.8
C
−8.8
D
−5.5
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.92 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.85
Instructor clarity4.95
Course effectiveness4.85
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Thiebaud Richeton 15 sections · 15 terms · 2017–2025 3.37GPA
Published grade shares · 15 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Richeton vs. the course average
A
+6.2
B
+1.7
C
−0.4
D
−5.0
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Fall 2025
Overall3.76 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.99
Instructor clarity3.28
Course effectiveness3.92
Instructor enthusiasm3.24
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability3.99
Instructor communication3.97
Instructor effectiveness3.72
Instructor respectfulness4.32
Assignment measured knowledge3.85
Instructor stimulates interest3.27
Jun Ueda 23 sections · 20 terms · 2013–2025 3.35GPA
Published grade shares · 23 sections · 2013–2025
Compare with the course
Ueda vs. the course average
A
+13.5
B
−6.1
C
−5.3
D
−2.2
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2013Fall 2025
Overall4.48 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.18
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.44
Instructor enthusiasm4.78
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.61
Instructor communication4.57
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.38
Instructor stimulates interest4.22
Yongtae Kim 11 sections · 7 terms · 2014–2023 3.26GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2014–2023
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
+0.6
B
+6.0
C
−2.7
D
−1.9
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2014Spring 2023
Overall4.10 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity3.67
Course effectiveness4.09
Instructor enthusiasm4.29
Instructor helpfulness3.67
Instructor availability4.41
Instructor communication4.21
Instructor effectiveness4.16
Instructor respectfulness4.51
Assignment measured knowledge3.98
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Ivy Chang 5 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2024 3.20GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Chang vs. the course average
A
+12.2
B
−9.7
C
−6.7
D
+1.2
F
+3.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2022Spring 2024
Overall4.43 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.26
Instructor clarity4.46
Course effectiveness4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.43
Instructor helpfulness4.11
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.46
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest4.31
Peter Mckeon 6 sections · 6 terms · 2014–2017 3.13GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2014–2017
Compare with the course
Mckeon vs. the course average
A
−8.6
B
+13.1
C
−2.4
D
+0.5
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2014Spring 2017
Overall4.72 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.58
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.73
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.82
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.67
Instructor stimulates interest4.58
Richard Cowan 7 sections · 6 terms · 2015–2022 3.08GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2015–2022
Compare with the course
Cowan vs. the course average
A
−11.9
B
+12.8
C
+3.1
D
−2.0
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2015Fall 2022
Overall4.73 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.39
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.57
Instructor enthusiasm4.81
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.37
Instructor stimulates interest4.57
Ye Zhao 16 sections · 14 terms · 2019–2025 2.97GPA
Published grade shares · 16 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Zhao vs. the course average
A
−5.5
B
+1.8
C
+0.3
D
+0.9
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.21 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.99
Course effectiveness4.12
Instructor enthusiasm4.26
Instructor helpfulness3.76
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.28
Instructor effectiveness4.33
Instructor respectfulness4.74
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.91
Nader Sadegh 23 sections · 19 terms · 2013–2025 2.86GPA
Published grade shares · 23 sections · 2013–2025
Compare with the course
Sadegh vs. the course average
A
−12.6
B
+1.6
C
+8.8
D
+1.6
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Spring 2025
Overall3.93 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.17
Instructor clarity3.94
Course effectiveness4.19
Instructor enthusiasm4.07
Instructor helpfulness3.54
Instructor availability3.97
Instructor communication4.14
Instructor effectiveness4.08
Instructor respectfulness3.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.09
Instructor stimulates interest3.76
Ye-Hwa Chen 26 sections · 18 terms · 2013–2022 2.76GPA
Published grade shares · 26 sections · 2013–2022
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
−10.6
B
−3.3
C
+4.6
D
+7.0
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Spring 2022
Overall3.80 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.32
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.32
Instructor enthusiasm3.83
Instructor helpfulness3.07
Instructor availability3.66
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.09
Instructor respectfulness2.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest3.76
Sathyanaraya Hanagud 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.77GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall1.69 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.00
Instructor clarity1.50
Course effectiveness2.20
Instructor enthusiasm2.50
Instructor helpfulness1.10
Instructor availability2.10
Instructor communication1.50
Instructor effectiveness1.30
Instructor respectfulness2.00
Assignment measured knowledge1.80
Instructor stimulates interest1.50
Michael Toth 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.23GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.88 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.60
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
Min Li 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.79 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.60
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Siavash Farzan 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.11GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.50 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Aldo Ferri 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 2.94GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.54 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Coskun Tekes 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 2.94GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.01 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Matthew Ballard 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 2.91GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall3.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Harvey Lipkin 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 2.80GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.40 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
David Smith 42 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.37
Instructor stimulates interest4.63
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.