Course record ME
ME 2110
Creative Decisions and Design
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
399 sections45 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score29/100
Below average
Roxanne Moore 5 sections · 5 terms · 2018–2022 3.96GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2018–2022
Compare with the course
Moore vs. the course average
A
+34.2
B
−29.5
C
−4.1
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2018Fall 2022
Overall4.78 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.22
Instructor clarity4.74
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.76
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.68
Yusuf Yaras 3 sections · 3 terms · 2024–2025 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Yaras vs. the course average
A
+27.8
B
−23.0
C
−4.1
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.92 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.86
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.92
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.92
Alexis Noel 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021
Compare with the course
Noel vs. the course average
A
+20.7
B
−15.9
C
−4.1
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.57
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Nisha Detchprohm 6 sections · 6 terms · 2023–2025 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Detchprohm vs. the course average
A
+17.5
B
−13.9
C
−2.9
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2023Fall 2025
Overall4.84 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.81
Course effectiveness4.39
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.86
Instructor availability4.91
Instructor communication4.84
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge3.32
Instructor stimulates interest4.58
Billyde Brown 3 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A
+16.4
B
−11.6
C
−4.1
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall2.97 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity2.58
Course effectiveness3.88
Instructor enthusiasm3.27
Instructor helpfulness1.82
Instructor availability3.04
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness3.25
Instructor respectfulness3.83
Assignment measured knowledge2.56
Instructor stimulates interest2.96
Jacob Blevins 6 sections · 6 terms · 2021–2024 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2021–2024
Compare with the course
Blevins vs. the course average
A
+20.6
B
−18.3
C
−2.4
D
−0.5
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2021Spring 2024
Overall4.79 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.52
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.44
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.78
Instructor availability4.82
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.84
Assignment measured knowledge3.74
Instructor stimulates interest4.71
Richard Cowan 18 sections · 10 terms · 2019–2023 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 18 sections · 2019–2023
Compare with the course
Cowan vs. the course average
A
+13.5
B
−9.8
C
−3.2
D
−0.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2023
Overall4.42 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.38
Instructor clarity4.37
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.46
Instructor helpfulness4.22
Instructor availability4.43
Instructor communication4.48
Instructor effectiveness4.52
Instructor respectfulness4.59
Assignment measured knowledge3.78
Instructor stimulates interest4.28
Richard Neu 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2020 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Neu vs. the course average
A
+19.0
B
−16.9
C
−4.1
D
−0.5
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Mahmoud Dinar 6 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2018 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Dinar vs. the course average
A
+11.0
B
−7.4
C
−2.9
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.80 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.54
Instructor clarity3.84
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm3.33
Instructor helpfulness4.24
Instructor availability4.27
Instructor communication3.70
Instructor effectiveness3.83
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.16
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
Hassan Rashidi 19 sections · 9 terms · 2015–2023 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 19 sections · 2015–2023
Compare with the course
Rashidi vs. the course average
A
+7.1
B
−3.2
C
−3.2
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2015Fall 2023
Overall4.74 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.42
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.31
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.71
Instructor availability4.74
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge3.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.64
F. Degertekin 20 sections · 10 terms · 2017–2025 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 20 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Degertekin vs. the course average
A
+7.5
B
−4.2
C
−2.6
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2017Spring 2025
Overall4.30 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.22
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.24
Instructor helpfulness4.43
Instructor availability4.26
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.41
Instructor respectfulness4.46
Assignment measured knowledge3.54
Instructor stimulates interest4.08
Christopher Adams 10 sections · 8 terms · 2019–2024 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2019–2024
Compare with the course
Adams vs. the course average
A
+8.1
B
−6.3
C
−1.1
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2024
Overall4.20 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.06
Course effectiveness4.29
Instructor enthusiasm4.37
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.33
Instructor communication4.16
Instructor effectiveness4.28
Instructor respectfulness4.21
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.94
Jeffrey Streator 6 sections · 5 terms · 2018–2020 3.66GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Streator vs. the course average
A
+5.2
B
−1.3
C
−3.2
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2018Spring 2020
Kristi Mehaffey 19 sections · 19 terms · 2017–2025 3.66GPA
Published grade shares · 19 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Mehaffey vs. the course average
A
+7.6
B
−6.0
C
−1.6
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2017Fall 2025
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.52
Instructor clarity4.71
Course effectiveness4.41
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.74
Instructor availability4.81
Instructor communication4.76
Instructor effectiveness4.81
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge3.72
Instructor stimulates interest4.63
Christopher Saldana 21 sections · 7 terms · 2017–2023 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 21 sections · 2017–2023
Compare with the course
Saldana vs. the course average
A
+7.1
B
−5.5
C
−1.0
D
−0.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Spring 2023
Overall4.48 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity4.52
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.59
Instructor helpfulness4.44
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication4.51
Instructor effectiveness4.52
Instructor respectfulness4.64
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Martin Jacobson 6 sections · 2 terms · 2025 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Jacobson vs. the course average
A
+10.4
B
−9.1
C
−3.4
D
+1.7
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Ifeanyi Ume 5 sections · 4 terms · 2017–2018 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Ume vs. the course average
A
+2.2
B
+2.5
C
−4.1
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2017Summer 2018
Overall4.25 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.03
Course effectiveness4.14
Instructor enthusiasm4.37
Instructor helpfulness4.29
Instructor availability4.26
Instructor communication4.21
Instructor effectiveness4.29
Instructor respectfulness4.64
Assignment measured knowledge3.66
Instructor stimulates interest3.91
Kyriaki Kalaitzidou 9 sections · 5 terms · 2019–2024 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2019–2024
Compare with the course
Kalaitzidou vs. the course average
A
+4.5
B
−3.8
C
−0.6
D
+0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2019Fall 2024
Overall3.98 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.01
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm3.95
Instructor helpfulness3.81
Instructor availability4.14
Instructor communication4.05
Instructor effectiveness4.12
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest3.85
Thomas Kurfess 23 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2025 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 23 sections · 2015–2025
Compare with the course
Kurfess vs. the course average
A
same
B
+3.2
C
−2.8
D
−0.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.25 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.23
Course effectiveness4.48
Instructor enthusiasm4.78
Instructor helpfulness4.03
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.21
Instructor respectfulness4.42
Assignment measured knowledge3.79
Instructor stimulates interest4.09
Richard Simmons 11 sections · 11 terms · 2017–2024 3.59GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2017–2024
Compare with the course
Simmons vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
+5.7
C
−3.2
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2017Fall 2024
Overall4.95 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.94
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability4.94
Instructor communication4.93
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness4.98
Assignment measured knowledge3.96
Instructor stimulates interest4.92
Kinsey Herrin 6 sections · 6 terms · 2021–2025 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Herrin vs. the course average
A
−1.7
B
+3.7
C
−1.2
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2021Fall 2025
Overall4.80 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.24
Instructor clarity4.71
Course effectiveness4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge3.81
Instructor stimulates interest4.61
Michael Helms 5 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2025 3.55GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Helms vs. the course average
A
−4.5
B
+6.6
C
−1.4
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.80 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Matthew Mcdowell 2 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.53GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Mcdowell vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+2.7
C
+1.4
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Cassandra Telenko 9 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2018 3.51GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2015–2018
Compare with the course
Telenko vs. the course average
A
−4.8
B
+4.2
C
+0.7
D
+0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.31 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.24
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness3.91
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.13
Instructor availability4.27
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.29
Instructor respectfulness4.61
Assignment measured knowledge3.41
Instructor stimulates interest4.04
William Singhose 82 sections · 11 terms · 2011–2021 3.45GPA
Published grade shares · 82 sections · 2011–2021
Compare with the course
Singhose vs. the course average
A
−8.9
B
+7.2
C
+1.3
D
+0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2021
Overall4.23 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.38
Instructor clarity4.38
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.58
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.33
Instructor respectfulness4.12
Assignment measured knowledge3.46
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Tequila Harris 7 sections · 6 terms · 2021–2025 3.43GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Harris vs. the course average
A
−12.8
B
+11.2
C
+2.3
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2021Spring 2025
Overall3.89 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.04
Instructor clarity3.62
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.19
Instructor helpfulness4.06
Instructor availability3.99
Instructor communication3.97
Instructor effectiveness3.92
Instructor respectfulness3.77
Assignment measured knowledge3.06
Instructor stimulates interest3.57
Amit Jariwala 5 sections · 5 terms · 2017–2025 3.41GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Jariwala vs. the course average
A
−10.1
B
+4.1
C
+6.6
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2017Summer 2025
Overall4.14 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.16
Course effectiveness4.58
Instructor enthusiasm4.26
Instructor helpfulness4.01
Instructor availability4.06
Instructor communication4.15
Instructor effectiveness4.24
Instructor respectfulness4.37
Assignment measured knowledge3.77
Instructor stimulates interest3.84
J. Mayor 71 sections · 10 terms · 2010–2014 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 71 sections · 2010–2014
Compare with the course
Mayor vs. the course average
A
−10.2
B
+3.8
C
+5.4
D
+0.7
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Fall 2014
Overall4.27 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.45
Instructor clarity4.36
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.74
Instructor helpfulness4.02
Instructor availability3.97
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.26
Assignment measured knowledge3.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Ashley Andrews 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 3.13GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Andrews vs. the course average
A
−40.5
B
+39.2
C
same
D
+1.6
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Kyle Saleeby 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Euisun Kim 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.79 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
David Macnair 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.80GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Dooroo Kim 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Nathaniel Devol 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Andres Garcia 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.73 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.77
Lisa Dewitte 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.33GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.79 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Douglas Schumer 18 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability3.40
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
David Smith 14 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness3.95
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Costas Arvanitis 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Craig Forest 15 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.43
Instructor helpfulness3.63
Instructor availability3.57
Instructor communication3.73
Instructor effectiveness3.83
Instructor respectfulness3.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Rodney Averett 14 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.46
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.54
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.37
Kathryn Wingate 10 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.32
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.68
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.82
Instructor stimulates interest4.37
Dirk Schaefer 17 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.67
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.57
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.87
Instructor stimulates interest4.23
Harvey Lipkin 17 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.25
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.15
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.05
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Raymond Vito 18 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.