Course record MATH

MATH 6701

Math Methods of Applied Sciences I

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

106 sections18 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2023
Flunk Score60/100
Strong

Professors 18 of 18

Yingjie Liu 3 sections · 1 term · 2025 3.99GPA
99.3% A
0.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2025

Compare with the course
Liu vs. the course average
A +16.4
B −13.7
C −2.2
D −0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Thomas Morley 8 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2011 3.97GPA
96.9% A
3.1% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2010–2011

Compare with the course
Morley vs. the course average
A +14.0
B −11.4
C −2.2
D −0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Guillermo Goldsztein 54 sections · 18 terms · 2010–2025 3.91GPA
91.4% A
8.4% B
0.2% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 54 sections · 2010–2025

Compare with the course
Goldsztein vs. the course average
A +8.5
B −6.1
C −2.0
D −0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Summer 2025
John Mccuan 5 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2020 3.84GPA
88.2% A
9.9% B
0.0% C
1.9% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2012–2020

Compare with the course
Mccuan vs. the course average
A +5.3
B −4.5
C −2.2
D +1.6
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Sung Ha Kang 6 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2022 3.77GPA
82.6% A
13.5% B
2.8% C
0.0% D
1.1% F

Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2015–2022

Compare with the course
Kang vs. the course average
A −0.3
B −0.9
C +0.6
D −0.3
F +0.9

Difference in percentage points.

Xu-Yan Chen 10 sections · 6 terms · 2013–2025 3.67GPA
73.1% A
21.9% B
3.6% C
1.4% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2013–2025

Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A −9.8
B +7.5
C +1.4
D +1.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Summer 2025
Luca Dieci 11 sections · 5 terms · 2017–2024 3.37GPA
49.0% A
40.0% B
10.6% C
0.1% D
0.2% F

Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2017–2024

Compare with the course
Dieci vs. the course average
A −33.9
B +25.6
C +8.4
D −0.2
F same

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Fall 2024
Salah Mehdi 2 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.28GPA
52.3% A
31.0% B
11.7% C
2.5% D
2.5% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023–2024

Compare with the course
Mehdi vs. the course average
A −30.6
B +16.5
C +9.5
D +2.3
F +2.4

Difference in percentage points.

Federico Bonetto 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample

Philippe Bonneau 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.69GPA
69.4% A
30.6% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample

Michael Northington 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.57GPA
59.6% A
37.2% B
3.2% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample

Saikat Biswas 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.56GPA
69.4% A
22.4% B
6.1% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample

Gunter Meyer 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.50GPA
50.0% A
50.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample

Ronghua Pan 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.38GPA
53.2% A
31.9% B
14.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample

Sigal Nitzan 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.17GPA
41.2% A
41.2% B
14.1% C
0.0% D
3.5% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample

Amalia Culiuc 12 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Maryam Yashtini 22 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Wilfred Gangbo 23 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.05
Instructor enthusiasm3.98
Instructor helpfulness4.13
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.03
Instructor respectfulness4.42
Instructor stimulates interest3.73
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.