Course record MATH
MATH 4305
Topics in Linear Algebra
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
84 sections25 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score9/100
Needs work
John Mccuan 2 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2014 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012–2014
Compare with the course
Mccuan vs. the course average
A
+31.7
B
−24.3
C
−2.3
D
−3.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.55 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.58
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.67
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.05
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.58
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Haiyu Zou 4 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Zou vs. the course average
A
+30.1
B
−21.9
C
−3.1
D
−3.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Hao-Min Zhou 8 sections · 5 terms · 2013–2023 3.66GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2013–2023
Compare with the course
Zhou vs. the course average
A
+17.1
B
−0.3
C
−12.5
D
−3.4
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2023
Overall4.60 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.11
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.23
Instructor availability4.44
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.68
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.61
Wei Zhu 2 sections · 1 term · 2024 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Zhu vs. the course average
A
+11.1
B
−13.3
C
+3.4
D
+0.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Plamen Iliev 16 sections · 7 terms · 2017–2025 3.32GPA
Published grade shares · 16 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Iliev vs. the course average
A
+2.1
B
+2.2
C
−5.2
D
+1.2
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2017Spring 2025
Overall4.17 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity4.01
Course effectiveness4.07
Instructor enthusiasm4.23
Instructor helpfulness3.94
Instructor availability4.41
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.28
Instructor respectfulness4.36
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.97
Xu-Yan Chen 13 sections · 9 terms · 2010–2022 3.31GPA
Published grade shares · 13 sections · 2010–2022
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
+3.5
B
−2.9
C
−0.5
D
+0.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Spring 2022
Overall3.96 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity3.88
Course effectiveness4.14
Instructor enthusiasm3.87
Instructor helpfulness3.67
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.32
Instructor effectiveness4.06
Instructor respectfulness4.16
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.49
Armenak Petrosyan 2 sections · 1 term · 2022 3.26GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022
Compare with the course
Petrosyan vs. the course average
A
−4.6
B
+5.6
C
+0.5
D
same
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Ronghua Pan 9 sections · 8 terms · 2010–2016 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Pan vs. the course average
A
−4.3
B
+5.4
C
−0.3
D
−2.9
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2016
Overall4.40 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.01
Instructor clarity4.32
Course effectiveness4.22
Instructor enthusiasm4.73
Instructor helpfulness4.19
Instructor availability4.49
Instructor communication4.38
Instructor effectiveness4.48
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.04
Igor Belegradek 3 sections · 1 term · 2023 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023
Compare with the course
Belegradek vs. the course average
A
−19.1
B
+22.5
C
+1.7
D
−3.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.93 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.69
Instructor clarity3.72
Course effectiveness3.86
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.67
Instructor availability4.33
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.96
Instructor respectfulness3.97
Assignment measured knowledge3.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.59
Wing Li 3 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2020 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019–2020
Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A
−15.4
B
+12.3
C
+8.1
D
−3.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.15 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.05
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.15
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge3.85
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Wenjing Liao 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2019 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Liao vs. the course average
A
−8.5
B
+2.4
C
+6.2
D
+1.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.49 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity4.47
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.08
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Michael Lacey 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2013 3.01GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Lacey vs. the course average
A
−16.7
B
+12.5
C
−1.8
D
+7.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.75 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest2.80
Andrzej Swiech 5 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2024 2.94GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2015–2024
Compare with the course
Swiech vs. the course average
A
−26.9
B
+16.3
C
+14.1
D
−1.8
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.85 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.63
Instructor clarity3.91
Course effectiveness4.12
Instructor enthusiasm3.42
Instructor helpfulness3.27
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.27
Instructor effectiveness4.02
Instructor respectfulness3.93
Assignment measured knowledge3.71
Instructor stimulates interest3.56
Luca Dieci 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2014 2.62GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2014
Compare with the course
Dieci vs. the course average
A
−16.5
B
−10.8
C
+11.2
D
+12.2
F
+3.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.17
Course effectiveness4.37
Instructor enthusiasm4.73
Instructor helpfulness3.93
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.57
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Thang Le 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2015 2.53GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2015
Compare with the course
Le vs. the course average
A
−27.5
B
+0.9
C
+14.2
D
+5.3
F
+7.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.70 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity3.83
Course effectiveness4.03
Instructor enthusiasm4.27
Instructor helpfulness2.67
Instructor availability3.83
Instructor communication3.73
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness3.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest3.33
Guillermo Goldsztein 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.48 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness4.05
Instructor availability4.45
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.05
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Doron Lubinsky 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample
Ernest Croot 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.36GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall3.13 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.37
Instructor clarity3.43
Course effectiveness3.60
Instructor enthusiasm3.63
Instructor helpfulness2.33
Instructor availability2.60
Instructor communication3.20
Instructor effectiveness3.27
Instructor respectfulness3.33
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.27
Romeo Awi 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.33GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.26 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.95
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Livia Corsi 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.27GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall3.73 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.75
Instructor clarity3.40
Course effectiveness3.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.33
Instructor helpfulness3.77
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness3.63
Instructor respectfulness3.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.73
Mohammad Ghomi 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.70GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall3.49 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.45
Instructor clarity3.45
Course effectiveness3.55
Instructor enthusiasm3.45
Instructor helpfulness2.90
Instructor availability3.70
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness3.55
Instructor respectfulness3.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Saikat Biswas 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.50GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall4.20 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.27
Instructor helpfulness3.47
Instructor availability4.07
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.53
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.77
Christopher Heil 7 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.23
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.47
Instructor helpfulness4.47
Instructor availability4.37
Instructor communication4.47
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.13
Jeffrey Geronimo 12 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Christian Houdre 6 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.57
Instructor enthusiasm3.67
Instructor helpfulness3.97
Instructor availability4.03
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.73
Instructor respectfulness3.57
Instructor stimulates interest3.23
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.