Course record MATH

MATH 1711

Finite Mathematics

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

120 sections35 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score4/100
Needs work

Professors 35 of 35

Yoan Delchev 4 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2018 3.76GPA
87.6% A
6.1% B
2.3% C
2.5% D
1.5% F

Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2016–2018

Compare with the course
Delchev vs. the course average
A +40.4
B −21.6
C −12.3
D −4.6
F −1.9

Difference in percentage points.

Athulya Ram Sreedharan Nair 3 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2023 3.71GPA
84.3% A
6.3% B
6.3% C
2.1% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2023

Compare with the course
Nair vs. the course average
A +37.2
B −21.5
C −8.3
D −5.0
F −2.4

Difference in percentage points.

Siddhi Krishna 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 3.59GPA
70.8% A
22.1% B
4.1% C
2.6% D
0.5% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2021

Compare with the course
Krishna vs. the course average
A +23.6
B −5.7
C −10.4
D −4.5
F −3.0

Difference in percentage points.

Sierra Knavel 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.37GPA
45.0% A
46.5% B
8.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025

Compare with the course
Knavel vs. the course average
A −2.1
B +18.8
C −6.1
D −7.1
F −3.5

Difference in percentage points.

Haiyu Zou 10 sections · 5 terms · 2018–2025 3.36GPA
60.7% A
22.2% B
11.4% C
3.5% D
2.2% F

Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2018–2025

Compare with the course
Zou vs. the course average
A +13.5
B −5.5
C −3.1
D −3.6
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2025
Timothy Spencer 2 sections · 1 term · 2016 3.31GPA
55.0% A
28.0% B
12.2% C
2.6% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016

Compare with the course
Spencer vs. the course average
A +7.9
B +0.3
C −2.4
D −4.5
F −1.3

Difference in percentage points.

Martin Engman 4 sections · 1 term · 2017 3.29GPA
54.3% A
24.4% B
17.6% C
2.9% D
0.8% F

Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017

Compare with the course
Engman vs. the course average
A +7.2
B −3.3
C +3.0
D −4.2
F −2.7

Difference in percentage points.

Klara Grodzinsky 16 sections · 4 terms · 2010–2022 3.22GPA
54.9% A
24.6% B
11.2% C
6.1% D
3.3% F

Published grade shares · 16 sections · 2010–2022

Compare with the course
Grodzinsky vs. the course average
A +7.7
B −3.2
C −3.4
D −1.0
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2022
Kisun Lee 6 sections · 3 terms · 2019–2020 3.21GPA
54.5% A
23.5% B
13.8% C
4.4% D
3.8% F

Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2019–2020

Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A +7.4
B −4.3
C −0.7
D −2.7
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

Christina Giannitsi 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2023 3.16GPA
49.2% A
29.1% B
13.2% C
5.8% D
2.6% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2023

Compare with the course
Giannitsi vs. the course average
A +2.1
B +1.4
C −1.3
D −1.3
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

Surena Hozoori 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2020 3.12GPA
56.7% A
18.0% B
14.0% C
2.2% D
9.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019–2020

Compare with the course
Hozoori vs. the course average
A +9.6
B −9.8
C −0.5
D −4.9
F +5.5

Difference in percentage points.

Emma Cohen 3 sections · 1 term · 2016 3.12GPA
46.9% A
29.6% B
14.6% C
6.8% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016

Compare with the course
Cohen vs. the course average
A −0.2
B +1.9
C +0.1
D −0.3
F −1.4

Difference in percentage points.

John Dever 4 sections · 2 terms · 2017 3.06GPA
40.8% A
35.3% B
14.5% C
8.2% D
1.3% F

Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017

Compare with the course
Dever vs. the course average
A −6.4
B +7.5
C −0.1
D +1.0
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

Salvador Barone 9 sections · 3 terms · 2014–2020 2.98GPA
40.5% A
31.9% B
15.5% C
9.8% D
2.4% F

Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2014–2020

Compare with the course
Barone vs. the course average
A −6.6
B +4.1
C +0.9
D +2.7
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

Ruidong Wang 6 sections · 3 terms · 2013–2014 2.98GPA
37.3% A
35.3% B
17.8% C
8.5% D
1.2% F

Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2013–2014

Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A −9.9
B +7.5
C +3.2
D +1.4
F −2.3

Difference in percentage points.

Shijie Xie 2 sections · 1 term · 2019 2.87GPA
34.8% A
40.2% B
8.7% C
8.7% D
7.6% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019

Compare with the course
Xie vs. the course average
A −12.4
B +12.5
C −5.9
D +1.6
F +4.1

Difference in percentage points.

Christopher Pryby 2 sections · 1 term · 2012 2.86GPA
43.1% A
24.9% B
11.2% C
15.7% D
5.1% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012

Compare with the course
Pryby vs. the course average
A −4.0
B −2.9
C −3.4
D +8.6
F +1.6

Difference in percentage points.

Peter Whalen 3 sections · 1 term · 2013 2.75GPA
30.6% A
39.8% B
9.2% C
14.6% D
5.8% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2013

Compare with the course
Whalen vs. the course average
A −16.5
B +12.1
C −5.4
D +7.5
F +2.3

Difference in percentage points.

Rebecca Winarski 3 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2013 2.71GPA
33.1% A
26.8% B
20.6% C
17.4% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2013

Compare with the course
Winarski vs. the course average
A −14.0
B −0.9
C +6.0
D +10.3
F −1.4

Difference in percentage points.

Albert Bush 4 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2014 2.70GPA
34.0% A
27.0% B
22.6% C
8.6% D
7.8% F

Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2014

Compare with the course
Bush vs. the course average
A −13.1
B −0.7
C +8.0
D +1.5
F +4.3

Difference in percentage points.

Spencer Backman 2 sections · 1 term · 2013 2.69GPA
33.0% A
27.8% B
19.1% C
13.9% D
6.2% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013

Compare with the course
Backman vs. the course average
A −14.2
B +0.1
C +4.5
D +6.8
F +2.7

Difference in percentage points.

Jonathan Paprocki 2 sections · 1 term · 2018 2.65GPA
33.9% A
27.0% B
18.5% C
12.7% D
7.9% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018

Compare with the course
Paprocki vs. the course average
A −13.3
B −0.7
C +4.0
D +5.6
F +4.5

Difference in percentage points.

Amey Kaloti 5 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2013 2.64GPA
17.9% A
45.1% B
27.2% C
2.4% D
7.4% F

Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2012–2013

Compare with the course
Kaloti vs. the course average
A −29.2
B +17.3
C +12.6
D −4.7
F +4.0

Difference in percentage points.

Sarah Collins 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.69GPA
82.8% A
8.1% B
5.1% C
2.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample

Benjamin Jaye 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.51GPA
63.9% A
26.8% B
6.2% C
2.1% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample

Tantan Dai 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.21GPA
43.2% A
35.2% B
21.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample

Brennan Dolson 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.20GPA
43.8% A
39.6% B
8.3% C
8.3% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample

John Olinde 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.13GPA
54.9% A
16.5% B
18.7% C
6.6% D
3.3% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample

Corrine Yap 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 2.94GPA
34.3% A
32.3% B
26.3% C
6.1% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample

Stephanie Mui 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 2.72GPA
34.4% A
28.1% B
16.7% C
16.7% D
4.2% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample

Minghao Li 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 2.57GPA
30.6% A
35.3% B
8.2% C
12.9% D
12.9% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample

Abhishek Dhawan 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 2.50GPA
14.9% A
42.5% B
26.4% C
8.0% D
8.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample

Shane Scott 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 2.48GPA
35.5% A
8.6% B
28.0% C
23.7% D
4.3% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample

Dantong Zhu 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 2.18GPA
40.6% A
0.0% B
9.4% C
36.5% D
13.5% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample

Anh Tran 21 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.77
Course effectiveness3.95
Instructor enthusiasm3.42
Instructor helpfulness3.33
Instructor availability3.83
Instructor communication3.88
Instructor effectiveness3.58
Instructor respectfulness3.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest2.80
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.