Course record MATH
MATH 1554
Linear Algebra
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
258 sections55 professors
Grades: 2015–2025Evaluations: 2015–2024
Flunk Score4/100
Needs work
Chunmei Wang 2 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A
+47.4
B
−23.1
C
−15.3
D
−5.4
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.29 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.45
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Philippe Bonneau 5 sections · 5 terms · 2021–2025 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Bonneau vs. the course average
A
+36.1
B
−15.0
C
−12.0
D
−5.4
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2021Fall 2025
Galyna Livshyts 3 sections · 1 term · 2018 3.72GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Livshyts vs. the course average
A
+37.1
B
−21.0
C
−7.0
D
−5.4
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.71 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity3.17
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm3.57
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.13
Instructor effectiveness3.67
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge4.57
Instructor stimulates interest3.27
Geng Chen 3 sections · 1 term · 2016 3.32GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
+10.4
B
−1.6
C
−4.8
D
−1.4
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.49 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity4.13
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.57
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.57
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Gregory Mayer 44 sections · 13 terms · 2016–2025 3.30GPA
Published grade shares · 44 sections · 2016–2025
Compare with the course
Mayer vs. the course average
A
+9.4
B
−1.3
C
−3.4
D
−2.4
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2025
Overall4.54 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.26
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.34
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.72
Instructor communication4.64
Instructor effectiveness4.62
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.14
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Laura Eslava 4 sections · 1 term · 2018 3.25GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Eslava vs. the course average
A
+6.1
B
+0.2
C
−2.9
D
−0.5
F
−2.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.39 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.52
Instructor clarity2.25
Course effectiveness3.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.58
Instructor helpfulness3.05
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness2.58
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge3.33
Instructor stimulates interest2.67
Sudipta Kolay 4 sections · 1 term · 2018 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Kolay vs. the course average
A
−0.1
B
+10.4
C
−4.5
D
−3.8
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.23 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.88
Instructor clarity2.83
Course effectiveness3.52
Instructor enthusiasm3.10
Instructor helpfulness3.08
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication3.13
Instructor effectiveness3.05
Instructor respectfulness3.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.58
Instructor stimulates interest2.58
Rui Han 3 sections · 1 term · 2018 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Han vs. the course average
A
+4.6
B
+3.7
C
−4.5
D
−3.4
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.33
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.63
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.57
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.43
Instructor stimulates interest3.83
Michael Lacey 30 sections · 4 terms · 2016–2019 3.20GPA
Published grade shares · 30 sections · 2016–2019
Compare with the course
Lacey vs. the course average
A
+0.1
B
+5.5
C
−0.1
D
−2.9
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2019
Overall3.85 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity3.36
Course effectiveness4.01
Instructor enthusiasm4.23
Instructor helpfulness3.72
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.59
Instructor respectfulness4.46
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.27
Wade Bloomquist 3 sections · 1 term · 2019 3.18GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019
Compare with the course
Bloomquist vs. the course average
A
+7.0
B
−1.6
C
−6.0
D
+0.4
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.53 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.17
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.77
Instructor helpfulness4.47
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.43
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Sneha Subramanian 4 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.14GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Subramanian vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+8.3
C
−1.0
D
−0.9
F
−2.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.74 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.72
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.72
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.72
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Alex Blumenthal 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2022 3.10GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Blumenthal vs. the course average
A
same
B
+0.8
C
−0.1
D
+0.3
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.35 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity4.26
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.62
Instructor helpfulness3.91
Instructor availability4.44
Instructor communication4.34
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.58
Assignment measured knowledge3.77
Instructor stimulates interest4.11
Igor Belegradek 18 sections · 5 terms · 2016–2025 3.06GPA
Published grade shares · 18 sections · 2016–2025
Compare with the course
Belegradek vs. the course average
A
−2.7
B
+3.4
C
+1.0
D
−2.0
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2025
Overall4.00 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.97
Instructor clarity3.47
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness3.77
Instructor availability4.39
Instructor communication4.17
Instructor effectiveness3.78
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest3.46
Seong Kim 2 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.02GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
−16.1
B
+20.6
C
−1.0
D
+0.1
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.29 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Anton Leykin 7 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2017 3.01GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2015–2017
Compare with the course
Leykin vs. the course average
A
−9.3
B
+9.7
C
+2.4
D
−2.0
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.47 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.23
Course effectiveness3.60
Instructor enthusiasm3.96
Instructor helpfulness3.26
Instructor availability3.79
Instructor communication3.34
Instructor effectiveness3.30
Instructor respectfulness3.87
Assignment measured knowledge3.81
Instructor stimulates interest3.03
Victor Vilaca Da Rocha 9 sections · 4 terms · 2019–2022 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2019–2022
Compare with the course
Rocha vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
−1.9
C
+2.1
D
+1.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2022
Overall4.16 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.04
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.16
Instructor enthusiasm4.44
Instructor helpfulness3.78
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.06
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.94
Yuta Hozumi 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 2.99GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Hozumi vs. the course average
A
+1.8
B
−6.7
C
+1.4
D
+1.3
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
Salvador Barone 30 sections · 12 terms · 2019–2025 2.97GPA
Published grade shares · 30 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Barone vs. the course average
A
−2.6
B
−1.0
C
+1.9
D
+1.1
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Spring 2025
Overall4.57 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.09
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness4.28
Instructor enthusiasm4.67
Instructor helpfulness4.35
Instructor availability4.61
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
Jeffrey Geronimo 4 sections · 1 term · 2017 2.95GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017
Compare with the course
Geronimo vs. the course average
A
−11.2
B
+9.3
C
+4.1
D
−2.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.20 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.77
Instructor clarity2.73
Course effectiveness3.42
Instructor enthusiasm3.95
Instructor helpfulness3.10
Instructor availability3.48
Instructor communication3.45
Instructor effectiveness2.70
Instructor respectfulness3.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest2.42
Stavros Garoufalidis 15 sections · 4 terms · 2016–2018 2.92GPA
Published grade shares · 15 sections · 2016–2018
Compare with the course
Garoufalidis vs. the course average
A
−2.5
B
+1.0
C
−5.4
D
+3.4
F
+3.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Spring 2018
Overall3.70 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.16
Instructor clarity3.54
Course effectiveness3.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.48
Instructor helpfulness3.05
Instructor availability3.57
Instructor communication3.82
Instructor effectiveness3.61
Instructor respectfulness4.03
Assignment measured knowledge3.81
Instructor stimulates interest3.51
Farjana Siddiqua 4 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 2.88GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Siddiqua vs. the course average
A
−1.5
B
−6.0
C
+2.4
D
+1.2
F
+3.9
Difference in percentage points.
Joseph Rabinoff 4 sections · 1 term · 2019 2.78GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2019
Compare with the course
Rabinoff vs. the course average
A
−10.1
B
−1.4
C
+4.3
D
+7.9
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.36 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.05
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest3.98
Jun Duan 3 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2019 2.77GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Duan vs. the course average
A
−11.3
B
+4.3
C
+1.8
D
+0.7
F
+4.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.39 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.23
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.77
Farshad Shirani 5 sections · 4 terms · 2021–2023 2.76GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2021–2023
Compare with the course
Shirani vs. the course average
A
−10.1
B
−1.8
C
+6.0
D
+3.4
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2021Fall 2023
Overall3.87 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.09
Instructor clarity3.40
Course effectiveness4.12
Instructor enthusiasm3.82
Instructor helpfulness3.66
Instructor availability4.16
Instructor communication4.06
Instructor effectiveness4.01
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.61
Cuyler Warnock 6 sections · 3 terms · 2025 2.74GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Warnock vs. the course average
A
−9.8
B
−1.3
C
+5.3
D
+0.9
F
+5.0
Difference in percentage points.
Abdon De Andrade Moutinho Neto 2 sections · 1 term · 2024 2.70GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Neto vs. the course average
A
−8.0
B
−6.4
C
+4.1
D
+6.9
F
+3.4
Difference in percentage points.
Amanda Hampton 2 sections · 1 term · 2024 2.68GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Hampton vs. the course average
A
−6.5
B
−6.8
C
+1.1
D
+7.3
F
+4.9
Difference in percentage points.
Edward Timko 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2022 2.63GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021–2022
Compare with the course
Timko vs. the course average
A
−15.2
B
−0.1
C
+4.9
D
+8.2
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.63 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.71
Instructor clarity3.24
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.44
Instructor helpfulness3.44
Instructor availability4.12
Instructor communication3.70
Instructor effectiveness3.86
Instructor respectfulness3.92
Assignment measured knowledge3.49
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Joshua Schroeder 3 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2023 2.57GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2023
Compare with the course
Schroeder vs. the course average
A
−17.1
B
−0.7
C
+6.3
D
+8.6
F
+2.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.19
Instructor clarity4.25
Course effectiveness4.18
Instructor enthusiasm4.54
Instructor helpfulness4.14
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.32
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.59
Assignment measured knowledge3.86
Instructor stimulates interest4.21
Daesung Kim 6 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2024 2.55GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
−14.5
B
−5.7
C
+10.0
D
+5.9
F
+4.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.61 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.96
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness4.11
Instructor enthusiasm3.45
Instructor helpfulness3.42
Instructor availability3.98
Instructor communication3.78
Instructor effectiveness3.82
Instructor respectfulness3.78
Assignment measured knowledge3.67
Instructor stimulates interest3.38
Rahul Kumar 2 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 2.54GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Kumar vs. the course average
A
−15.0
B
−4.8
C
+7.3
D
+8.5
F
+3.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.09 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.09
Instructor clarity3.92
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.12
Instructor helpfulness3.94
Instructor availability4.25
Instructor communication4.18
Instructor effectiveness4.24
Instructor respectfulness4.21
Assignment measured knowledge3.76
Instructor stimulates interest3.87
Ruoci Sun 4 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2024 2.36GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Sun vs. the course average
A
−23.1
B
−2.6
C
+12.4
D
+5.1
F
+8.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.44 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity2.79
Course effectiveness4.05
Instructor enthusiasm3.55
Instructor helpfulness3.41
Instructor availability3.95
Instructor communication3.57
Instructor effectiveness3.47
Instructor respectfulness3.62
Assignment measured knowledge3.65
Instructor stimulates interest3.19
Salah Mehdi 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Overall4.85 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Ronghua Pan 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.48GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.21 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.17
Instructor clarity3.73
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.38
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.28
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Mawutor Amanfu 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Overall4.76 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Guangyu Cui 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.21GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.45 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.23
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Alperen Ozdemir 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.10GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Overall3.63 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.20
Course effectiveness3.92
Instructor enthusiasm3.38
Instructor helpfulness3.33
Instructor availability4.22
Instructor communication3.63
Instructor effectiveness3.63
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.23
Junghwan Park 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.05GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Overall4.26 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.07
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.24
Instructor enthusiasm4.17
Instructor helpfulness4.06
Instructor availability4.41
Instructor communication4.29
Instructor effectiveness4.46
Instructor respectfulness4.46
Assignment measured knowledge4.06
Instructor stimulates interest4.01
Shunyu Wan 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.04GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Anup Poudel 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.02GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Ikenna Nometa 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 2.98GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Jonathan Paprocki 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 2.85GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Alexander Hoyer 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 2.83GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.92 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Ashley Wheeler 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 2.80GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall3.48 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.22
Instructor clarity3.10
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm3.08
Instructor helpfulness3.38
Instructor availability4.17
Instructor communication3.63
Instructor effectiveness3.52
Instructor respectfulness3.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.10
Jorge Viquez Bolanos 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 2.70GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.24 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Jorge Gonzalez 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 2.62GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall2.75 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity1.60
Course effectiveness3.83
Instructor enthusiasm2.80
Instructor helpfulness2.60
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness2.40
Instructor respectfulness3.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest2.60
Logan Hart 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 2.60GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Hannah Turner 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 2.58GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall3.95 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.92
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness3.85
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.25
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Mollene Denton 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 2.55GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Yaghoub Rahimi 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 2.52GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall3.60 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.89
Instructor clarity3.47
Course effectiveness4.01
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness3.42
Instructor availability4.09
Instructor communication3.78
Instructor effectiveness3.71
Instructor respectfulness3.69
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest3.14
Randall Van Why 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 2.47GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Jonathan Simone 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 2.44GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.62 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.05
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest3.95
Jianbo Cui 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 2.22GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall3.51 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.67
Instructor clarity3.00
Course effectiveness3.73
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness3.40
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Christina Giannitsi 92 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Manh Huynh 26 reported responses 3.39Eval / 5
Overall3.39 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.98
Instructor clarity2.61
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm3.66
Instructor helpfulness3.30
Instructor availability3.91
Instructor communication3.67
Instructor effectiveness3.38
Instructor respectfulness3.51
Assignment measured knowledge3.69
Instructor stimulates interest3.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.