Course record LMC
LMC 3432
Technical Communication Strategies
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
109 sections20 professors
Grades: 2015–2024Evaluations: 2015–2024
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Michael Measel 4 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2023 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2023
Compare with the course
Measel vs. the course average
A
+14.5
B
−13.2
C
−0.9
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.29 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.94
Instructor clarity4.18
Course effectiveness4.34
Instructor enthusiasm4.57
Instructor helpfulness4.29
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.47
Instructor effectiveness4.27
Instructor respectfulness4.22
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest3.88
Thomas Kirkscey 3 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2018 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Kirkscey vs. the course average
A
+14.5
B
−13.2
C
−0.9
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.83 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Lee Hibbard 14 sections · 8 terms · 2021–2024 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2021–2024
Compare with the course
Hibbard vs. the course average
A
+12.9
B
−11.7
C
−0.8
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2021Summer 2024
Overall4.64 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.07
Instructor clarity4.61
Course effectiveness4.44
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.64
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.69
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.34
Instructor stimulates interest4.43
Matthew Halm 3 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Halm vs. the course average
A
+13.2
B
−12.6
C
−0.3
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.70 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.64
Instructor enthusiasm4.64
Instructor helpfulness4.71
Instructor availability4.82
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.71
Assignment measured knowledge4.73
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Dorothea Coblentz 11 sections · 6 terms · 2019–2024 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2019–2024
Compare with the course
Coblentz vs. the course average
A
+12.1
B
−11.7
C
same
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Spring 2024
Overall4.38 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.57
Instructor clarity4.27
Course effectiveness4.01
Instructor enthusiasm4.42
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.43
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge3.96
Instructor stimulates interest3.96
Kathleen Schaag 8 sections · 4 terms · 2018–2020 3.96GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Schaag vs. the course average
A
+11.0
B
−9.7
C
−0.9
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Spring 2020
Overall4.55 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.73
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness3.97
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.47
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Wendy Truran 2 sections · 1 term · 2024 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Truran vs. the course average
A
+8.5
B
−7.2
C
−0.9
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Jonathan Shelley 10 sections · 5 terms · 2018–2021 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2018–2021
Compare with the course
Shelley vs. the course average
A
+8.1
B
−7.4
C
−0.5
D
−0.4
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Spring 2021
Overall4.76 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.14
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.86
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.74
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Halcyon Lawrence 9 sections · 5 terms · 2016–2018 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2016–2018
Compare with the course
Lawrence vs. the course average
A
+6.2
B
−5.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Spring 2018
Overall4.34 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.47
Instructor clarity4.28
Course effectiveness3.73
Instructor enthusiasm4.56
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.54
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.38
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge3.91
Instructor stimulates interest3.66
Andrew Nance 2 sections · 1 term · 2024 3.86GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Nance vs. the course average
A
+5.8
B
−7.1
C
−0.9
D
+2.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Casey Wilson 3 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Wilson vs. the course average
A
+4.0
B
−7.8
C
+4.2
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.42 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness3.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Liz Hutter 4 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Hutter vs. the course average
A
−6.6
B
+6.9
C
+0.1
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.98
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Kate Holterhoff 2 sections · 1 term · 2018 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Holterhoff vs. the course average
A
−6.7
B
+7.0
C
+0.1
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.26 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.25
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness3.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.45
Kelly Fitzpatrick 2 sections · 1 term · 2016 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Fitzpatrick vs. the course average
A
−9.5
B
+9.8
C
+0.1
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.69 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.95
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Olga Menagarishvili 3 sections · 2 terms · 2015 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Menagarishvili vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+5.4
C
−0.3
D
+1.7
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.77 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.43
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness2.93
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.03
Instructor communication3.73
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness3.90
Assignment measured knowledge2.87
Instructor stimulates interest2.77
Sarah Lozier 4 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Lozier vs. the course average
A
−14.4
B
+14.7
C
+0.1
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.00 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.08
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness3.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.28
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.47
Instructor communication3.98
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness3.88
Assignment measured knowledge3.42
Instructor stimulates interest3.35
Amanda Girard 18 sections · 12 terms · 2017–2023 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 18 sections · 2017–2023
Compare with the course
Girard vs. the course average
A
−16.0
B
+16.8
C
−0.4
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Fall 2023
Overall3.79 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.24
Instructor clarity3.99
Course effectiveness3.68
Instructor enthusiasm4.16
Instructor helpfulness3.55
Instructor availability3.97
Instructor communication3.82
Instructor effectiveness3.72
Instructor respectfulness3.87
Assignment measured knowledge3.58
Instructor stimulates interest3.24
Joseph Weakland 2 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Weakland vs. the course average
A
−27.0
B
+27.3
C
+0.1
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.46 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.70
Instructor clarity3.75
Course effectiveness2.90
Instructor enthusiasm3.85
Instructor helpfulness3.40
Instructor availability3.95
Instructor communication3.25
Instructor effectiveness3.20
Instructor respectfulness3.60
Assignment measured knowledge2.95
Instructor stimulates interest2.70
Joy Robinson 5 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.19GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Robinson vs. the course average
A
−48.3
B
+36.3
C
+7.3
D
+4.7
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.18 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.56
Instructor clarity3.48
Course effectiveness2.72
Instructor enthusiasm3.36
Instructor helpfulness3.20
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication2.80
Instructor effectiveness3.06
Instructor respectfulness3.32
Assignment measured knowledge2.54
Instructor stimulates interest2.32
Kristine Nagel 18 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.38
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.25
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.38
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.33
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.