Course record ISYE
ISYE 4031
Regression and Forecasting
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
101 sections17 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score12/100
Needs work
Jye-Chyi Lu 5 sections · 5 terms · 2021–2025 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Lu vs. the course average
A
+41.4
B
−25.3
C
−13.5
D
−1.8
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2021Summer 2025
Overall4.80 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.13
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness4.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.82
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Rosemarie Santa Gonzalez 3 sections · 1 term · 2025 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Gonzalez vs. the course average
A
+35.0
B
−19.9
C
−13.5
D
−0.8
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Harry Sharp 4 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Sharp vs. the course average
A
+26.8
B
−12.2
C
−12.0
D
−1.8
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2022Spring 2025
Overall3.95 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.23
Instructor clarity3.49
Course effectiveness3.78
Instructor enthusiasm4.31
Instructor helpfulness3.77
Instructor availability4.12
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.46
Assignment measured knowledge3.56
Instructor stimulates interest3.71
Shihao Yang 8 sections · 5 terms · 2021–2025 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Yang vs. the course average
A
+14.3
B
−1.4
C
−10.3
D
−1.8
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2021Fall 2025
Overall4.44 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.06
Instructor clarity4.29
Course effectiveness4.41
Instructor enthusiasm4.54
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge4.01
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
I-Hsiang Lee 33 sections · 18 terms · 2019–2025 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 33 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
+0.1
C
−6.3
D
−0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.62 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.71
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.76
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.39
Instructor stimulates interest4.42
Stewart Curry 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2018 3.21GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Curry vs. the course average
A
−3.8
B
−2.3
C
+2.6
D
+4.4
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.54 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.55
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Roshan Joseph 3 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2020 3.04GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2013–2020
Compare with the course
Joseph vs. the course average
A
−17.3
B
+7.4
C
+7.1
D
+2.1
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.17 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.17
Instructor clarity3.97
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.17
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness4.23
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.83
Parisa Yousefi Zowj 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.11 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Alexander Shapiro 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.16 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Seonghye Jeon 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.18GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Alexander Stroh 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 2.93GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.72 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Justin Vastola 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.92GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall4.25 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Benjamin Johnson 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 2.88GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.71 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Rodrigue Ngueyep Tzoumpe 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.84GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.55 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Matthew Lacer 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.81GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall4.05 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Justin Kirkby 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 2.80GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall3.75 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity2.40
Course effectiveness3.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication3.40
Instructor effectiveness3.60
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
Gamze Tokol-Goldsman 51 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.26
Instructor clarity4.17
Course effectiveness4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness4.14
Instructor availability4.52
Instructor communication4.41
Instructor effectiveness4.38
Instructor respectfulness4.64
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.79
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.