Course record ISYE

ISYE 3133

Engineering Optimization

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

83 sections29 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score4/100
Needs work

Professors 29 of 29

Guergana Ilieva 5 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2025 3.74GPA
80.9% A
14.3% B
3.1% C
1.2% D
0.4% F

Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2023–2025

Compare with the course
Ilieva vs. the course average
A +39.6
B −18.8
C −16.4
D −3.3
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

Dawn Strickland 15 sections · 9 terms · 2015–2023 3.24GPA
44.0% A
38.5% B
14.4% C
2.6% D
0.5% F

Published grade shares · 15 sections · 2015–2023

Compare with the course
Strickland vs. the course average
A +2.7
B +5.4
C −5.1
D −1.9
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Summer 2015Fall 2023
Natashia Boland 6 sections · 1 term · 2019 3.10GPA
39.4% A
41.5% B
10.4% C
7.1% D
1.5% F

Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2019

Compare with the course
Boland vs. the course average
A −2.0
B +8.4
C −9.0
D +2.6
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

Renato Monteiro 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2018 3.04GPA
36.9% A
34.8% B
24.1% C
4.3% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2018

Compare with the course
Monteiro vs. the course average
A −4.4
B +1.7
C +4.6
D −0.2
F −1.6

Difference in percentage points.

Mohit Singh 3 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2025 3.04GPA
42.5% A
30.1% B
18.2% C
6.8% D
2.4% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2025

Compare with the course
Singh vs. the course average
A +1.1
B −3.0
C −1.3
D +2.4
F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

Santanu Dey 22 sections · 5 terms · 2012–2019 2.99GPA
34.1% A
37.2% B
23.9% C
4.1% D
0.7% F

Published grade shares · 22 sections · 2012–2019

Compare with the course
Dey vs. the course average
A −7.3
B +4.1
C +4.4
D −0.3
F −0.9

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Fall 2019
Shabbir Ahmed 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2011 2.89GPA
27.7% A
42.4% B
21.7% C
7.1% D
1.1% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2011

Compare with the course
Ahmed vs. the course average
A −13.6
B +9.3
C +2.3
D +2.6
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

Kaitlyn Moug 5 sections · 3 terms · 2024–2025 2.88GPA
39.7% A
22.7% B
27.9% C
6.0% D
3.7% F

Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2024–2025

Compare with the course
Moug vs. the course average
A −1.6
B −10.4
C +8.4
D +1.5
F +2.1

Difference in percentage points.

Nicole Redder 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2022 2.70GPA
29.7% A
34.1% B
21.6% C
5.9% D
8.6% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021–2022

Compare with the course
Redder vs. the course average
A −11.6
B +1.0
C +2.2
D +1.5
F +7.0

Difference in percentage points.

Alisha Waller 5 sections · 5 terms · 2010–2012 2.69GPA
28.2% A
34.0% B
23.9% C
6.6% D
7.2% F

Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2010–2012

Compare with the course
Waller vs. the course average
A −13.1
B +0.9
C +4.5
D +2.1
F +5.6

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2012
Yuang Chen 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample

Chungjae Lee 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample

Xu Sun 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.57GPA
61.9% A
33.0% B
5.2% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample

Diego Moran Ramirez 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.34GPA
49.5% A
37.4% B
11.1% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample

Marco Molinaro 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.20GPA
44.0% A
36.0% B
16.0% C
4.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample

Chan Lee 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 3.06GPA
42.7% A
30.2% B
18.8% C
5.2% D
3.1% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample

Paul Kerl 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
39.0% A
30.0% B
27.0% C
2.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample

Qie He 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
34.7% A
39.8% B
16.3% C
7.1% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample

Beste Basciftci 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 2.97GPA
47.0% A
14.0% B
28.0% C
11.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample

Serhat Gul 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.97GPA
35.6% A
27.8% B
35.6% C
1.1% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample

Raymond Powers 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.96GPA
34.4% A
33.3% B
27.1% C
5.2% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample

James Bailey 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.79GPA
30.4% A
30.4% B
30.4% C
4.3% D
4.3% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample

Gustavo Angulo Olivares 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.76GPA
20.4% A
44.9% B
28.6% C
4.1% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample

Eva Lee 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.71GPA
26.3% A
26.3% B
42.1% C
4.2% D
1.1% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample

Robert Parker 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 2.11GPA
4.5% A
26.1% B
44.3% C
25.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample

Arthur Delarue 30 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.28
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.67
Instructor helpfulness4.59
Instructor availability4.51
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.59
Assignment measured knowledge3.92
Instructor stimulates interest4.42
Weijun Xie 28 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.12
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness4.52
Instructor enthusiasm4.24
Instructor helpfulness4.18
Instructor availability4.41
Instructor communication3.94
Instructor effectiveness4.24
Instructor respectfulness4.52
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest3.81
Di Liu 11 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Edward He 9 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.55
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.