Course record ISYE
ISYE 2028
Basic Statistical Methods
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
80 sections31 professors
Grades: 2010–2019Evaluations: 2012–2019
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work
Joshua Mcdonald 2 sections · 1 term · 2011 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011
Compare with the course
Mcdonald vs. the course average
A
+48.1
B
−26.4
C
−16.2
D
−3.9
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Kamran Paynabar 4 sections · 4 terms · 2012–2018 3.52GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2012–2018
Compare with the course
Paynabar vs. the course average
A
+16.7
B
−1.2
C
−11.4
D
−2.6
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Spring 2018
Overall4.85 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.77
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.83
Jye-Chyi Lu 11 sections · 11 terms · 2010–2019 3.48GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2010–2019
Compare with the course
Lu vs. the course average
A
+16.3
B
−4.8
C
−7.4
D
−2.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2019
Overall4.46 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.04
Instructor clarity4.07
Course effectiveness4.09
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.56
Instructor communication4.54
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge4.01
Instructor stimulates interest4.29
Yao Xie 4 sections · 4 terms · 2013–2018 3.34GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2013–2018
Compare with the course
Xie vs. the course average
A
+3.2
B
+8.2
C
−8.0
D
−2.4
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2018
Overall4.13 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity3.88
Course effectiveness4.08
Instructor enthusiasm4.38
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.28
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.05
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest3.67
Mohammad Nabhan 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018 3.19GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Nabhan vs. the course average
A
+1.0
B
+1.6
C
−1.6
D
−1.1
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.80 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Nagi Gebraeel 4 sections · 4 terms · 2012–2018 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2012–2018
Compare with the course
Gebraeel vs. the course average
A
+1.7
B
−0.3
C
−1.9
D
+0.1
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2012Fall 2018
Overall3.85 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity3.67
Course effectiveness3.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.22
Instructor helpfulness3.52
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication3.77
Instructor effectiveness3.58
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge3.77
Instructor stimulates interest3.60
I-Hsiang Lee 5 sections · 4 terms · 2014–2019 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2014–2019
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
−0.2
B
+0.3
C
−0.1
D
+1.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2014Spring 2019
Overall4.45 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.44
Instructor enthusiasm4.78
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.48
Instructor effectiveness4.42
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Assignment measured knowledge4.34
Instructor stimulates interest4.24
Branislav Vidakovic 2 sections · 1 term · 2014 3.11GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014
Compare with the course
Vidakovic vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
−11.9
C
+17.2
D
−3.9
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.84 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Nicoleta Serban 5 sections · 5 terms · 2011–2016 3.08GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2011–2016
Compare with the course
Serban vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
−1.5
C
+2.1
D
+2.9
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Fall 2016
Overall4.15 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.27
Instructor enthusiasm4.37
Instructor helpfulness3.93
Instructor availability4.27
Instructor communication4.27
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge4.43
Instructor stimulates interest3.87
Xiaoming Huo 5 sections · 5 terms · 2010–2016 3.05GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Huo vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
+4.4
C
+3.6
D
−0.5
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Spring 2016
Overall3.64 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.87
Instructor clarity3.40
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.97
Instructor helpfulness3.23
Instructor availability3.97
Instructor communication3.73
Instructor effectiveness3.67
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest3.13
Benjamin Haaland 3 sections · 3 terms · 2014–2016 2.99GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2014–2016
Compare with the course
Haaland vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+1.1
C
+2.0
D
+3.9
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.74 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.57
Instructor clarity3.20
Course effectiveness3.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.27
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.13
Instructor communication3.67
Instructor effectiveness3.53
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.43
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
Paul Kvam 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2014 2.90GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Kvam vs. the course average
A
−13.2
B
+3.9
C
+5.9
D
+3.9
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.08 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.30
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
James Bailey 2 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2017 2.85GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015–2017
Compare with the course
Bailey vs. the course average
A
−14.2
B
+3.6
C
+7.4
D
+0.7
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Alexander Shapiro 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013 2.81GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013
Compare with the course
Shapiro vs. the course average
A
−11.0
B
−2.4
C
+7.6
D
+3.1
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.30 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity2.95
Course effectiveness3.55
Instructor enthusiasm3.60
Instructor helpfulness3.05
Instructor availability3.65
Instructor communication3.15
Instructor effectiveness3.20
Instructor respectfulness3.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest3.10
Alisha Waller 9 sections · 7 terms · 2014–2018 2.71GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2014–2018
Compare with the course
Waller vs. the course average
A
−13.7
B
−0.1
C
+5.8
D
+0.5
F
+7.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2014Spring 2018
Overall4.37 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.74
Instructor helpfulness4.21
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.19
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest3.91
Tuo Zhao 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.54GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall2.64 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.80
Instructor clarity2.30
Course effectiveness2.80
Instructor enthusiasm2.80
Instructor helpfulness2.30
Instructor availability3.10
Instructor communication2.70
Instructor effectiveness2.40
Instructor respectfulness3.10
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest2.40
Geet Lahoti 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.51GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall2.59 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity2.20
Course effectiveness2.50
Instructor enthusiasm2.80
Instructor helpfulness2.40
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication2.00
Instructor effectiveness2.10
Instructor respectfulness3.50
Assignment measured knowledge2.80
Instructor stimulates interest1.80
Ross Hilton 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.45GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.51 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Rui Tuo 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.30GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.88 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.10
Burak Kocuk 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 3.21GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall3.71 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness3.20
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest2.80
Raymond Powers 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.07GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.34 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Heeyoung Kim 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.06GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Yoonmo Koo 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.03GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall3.56 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness3.30
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.40
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest2.90
Gunter Sharp 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Aly Megahed 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.42 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Xinyu Min 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.01 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.40
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
Huizhu Wang 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.97GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall3.99 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness3.40
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Yajun Mei 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.96GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Tonya Woods 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.89GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.24 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Matthew Lacer 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.83GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Gamze Tokol-Goldsman 55 reported responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness3.60
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness3.10
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.30
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest2.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.