Course record GT

GT 4823

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

65 sections30 professors
Grades: 2014–2020Evaluations: 2014–2019

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record

Professors 30 of 30

Todd Sulchek 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2019 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2019

Compare with the course
Sulchek vs. the course average
A +22.0
B −20.1
C −1.5
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Aaron Young 2 sections · 1 term · 2020 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020

Compare with the course
Young vs. the course average
A +22.0
B −20.1
C −1.5
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Richard Cowan 2 sections · 1 term · 2020 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020

Compare with the course
Cowan vs. the course average
A +22.0
B −20.1
C −1.5
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Fariborz Farahmand 3 sections · 1 term · 2020 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020

Compare with the course
Farahmand vs. the course average
A +22.0
B −20.1
C −1.5
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

James Gumbart 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2019 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2019

Compare with the course
Gumbart vs. the course average
A +22.0
B −20.1
C −1.5
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Mary Realff 5 sections · 5 terms · 2017–2019 3.83GPA
83.2% A
16.8% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2017–2019

Compare with the course
Realff vs. the course average
A +5.2
B −3.3
C −1.5
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Fall 2019
Craig Forest 5 sections · 4 terms · 2014–2020 3.81GPA
83.4% A
14.0% B
2.2% C
0.4% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2014–2020

Compare with the course
Forest vs. the course average
A +5.4
B −6.1
C +0.7
D +0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2014Spring 2020
Amit Jariwala 15 sections · 11 terms · 2014–2020 3.79GPA
81.8% A
15.6% B
2.2% C
0.4% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 15 sections · 2014–2020

Compare with the course
Jariwala vs. the course average
A +3.8
B −4.5
C +0.7
D +0.3
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2014Spring 2020
James Rains 8 sections · 7 terms · 2016–2020 3.70GPA
74.0% A
21.8% B
4.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2016–2020

Compare with the course
Rains vs. the course average
A −4.0
B +1.6
C +2.7
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Spring 2020
Berdinus Bras 3 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2020 3.43GPA
47.0% A
49.7% B
3.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015–2020

Compare with the course
Bras vs. the course average
A −31.0
B +29.5
C +1.8
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Mary Weitnauer 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2019 3.43GPA
44.0% A
55.0% B
1.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2019

Compare with the course
Weitnauer vs. the course average
A −34.0
B +34.9
C −0.5
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Ying Zhang 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2020 3.25GPA
44.0% A
50.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
6.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2020

Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A −34.0
B +29.9
C −1.5
D −0.1
F +5.8

Difference in percentage points.

David Macnair 2 sections · 1 term · 2020 3.15GPA
20.0% A
75.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020

Compare with the course
Macnair vs. the course average
A −58.0
B +54.9
C +3.5
D −0.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Albert Frazier 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample

Gleb Yushin 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample

Yan Wang 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample

Gregory Sawicki 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.89GPA
89.0% A
11.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample

James Stubbs 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.50GPA
50.0% A
50.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample

Thomas Collins 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
0.0% A
100.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample

David Orloff 30 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Meisha Shofner 8 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Kristine Nagel 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
William Smith 8 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge3.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Hassan Rashidi 6 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Linda Milor 1 reported responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.00
Instructor helpfulness3.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness3.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Michael West 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Erick Maxwell 7 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Kathryn Wingate 30 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.20
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
James Kenney 16 reported responses 3.00Eval / 5
Overall3.00 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.00
Instructor helpfulness3.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness3.00
Instructor respectfulness3.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Thomas Michaels 16 reported responses 3.00Eval / 5
Overall3.00 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.00
Instructor helpfulness3.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness3.00
Instructor respectfulness3.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.