Course record GT
GT 2803
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
29 sections20 professors
Grades: 2013–2025Evaluations: 2013–2023
Flunk Score81/100
Excellent
Katherine Williams 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Williams vs. the course average
A
+6.1
B
−5.3
C
−0.5
D
−0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Latife Toktay-Tsiotras 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Toktay-Tsiotras vs. the course average
A
+6.1
B
−5.3
C
−0.5
D
−0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Joyelle Harris 5 sections · 4 terms · 2018–2021 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2018–2021
Compare with the course
Harris vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
−3.9
C
+0.7
D
+0.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2021
Ellen Zegura 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Zegura vs. the course average
A
−0.8
B
+1.6
C
−0.5
D
−0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Rudolph Gleason 4 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Gleason vs. the course average
A
+0.8
B
−0.7
C
+0.1
D
−0.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2022Fall 2025
Overall3.79 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.02
Instructor clarity3.25
Course effectiveness3.11
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness2.79
Instructor availability4.29
Instructor communication3.82
Instructor effectiveness3.75
Instructor respectfulness4.46
Assignment measured knowledge2.71
Instructor stimulates interest3.29
Raymond Vito 7 sections · 6 terms · 2013–2018 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2013–2018
Compare with the course
Vito vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
+1.4
C
−0.5
D
−0.1
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Spring 2018
Overall4.46 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.18
Instructor clarity4.38
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.24
Instructor availability4.49
Instructor communication4.04
Instructor effectiveness4.44
Instructor respectfulness4.69
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest4.58
Chad Slieper 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Slieper vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
+4.7
C
−0.5
D
−0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Monica Halka 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.29 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Kim Cobb 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.42 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Nicole Leonard 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Ashok Goel 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.72 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Wendy Newstetter 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.56GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.29 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness4.14
Instructor availability4.01
Instructor communication4.13
Instructor effectiveness4.31
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Wayne Li 10 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Instructor stimulates interest4.92
Elizabeth Disalvo 1 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Richard Barke 5 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Sabir Khan 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Matthew Realff 5 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.85
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Valerie Thomas 2 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.50
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability3.50
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Jennifer Hirsch 2 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Daniel Matisoff 1 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.