Course record FREN
FREN 1002
Elementary French II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
209 sections18 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score49/100
Mixed record
Nora Cottille-Foley 4 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Cottille-Foley vs. the course average
A
+19.8
B
−15.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.37 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.97
Instructor clarity4.21
Course effectiveness4.18
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.31
Instructor availability4.03
Instructor communication4.17
Instructor effectiveness4.36
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge3.96
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Brigitte Stepanov 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2023 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2023
Compare with the course
Stepanov vs. the course average
A
+18.9
B
−14.9
C
−3.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.81 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.22
Instructor clarity4.78
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.82
Instructor communication4.91
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.98
Assignment measured knowledge4.54
Instructor stimulates interest4.54
Sonia Serafin 22 sections · 22 terms · 2012–2022 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 22 sections · 2012–2022
Compare with the course
Serafin vs. the course average
A
+18.7
B
−14.7
C
−3.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2012Fall 2022
Overall4.70 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.32
Instructor clarity4.69
Course effectiveness4.61
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.69
Instructor availability4.59
Instructor communication4.66
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.84
Assignment measured knowledge4.53
Instructor stimulates interest4.52
Barbara Blackbourn 3 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2013 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2013
Compare with the course
Blackbourn vs. the course average
A
+13.5
B
−9.4
C
−3.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.80 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Sophie Landrieux Kartochian 3 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2022 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2022
Compare with the course
Kartochian vs. the course average
A
+12.2
B
−9.8
C
−1.3
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.75 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Lionel Gall 39 sections · 12 terms · 2010–2025 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 39 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Gall vs. the course average
A
+10.9
B
−8.9
C
−1.2
D
−0.4
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2025
Overall4.90 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.48
Instructor clarity4.87
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.89
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.91
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.99
Assignment measured knowledge4.74
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Christophe Ippolito 11 sections · 10 terms · 2010–2025 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Ippolito vs. the course average
A
+6.7
B
−2.7
C
−3.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2025
Overall3.96 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.63
Course effectiveness3.99
Instructor enthusiasm3.86
Instructor helpfulness3.84
Instructor availability4.09
Instructor communication4.26
Instructor effectiveness4.03
Instructor respectfulness4.36
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest3.64
Franck Findling 6 sections · 6 terms · 2023–2025 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Findling vs. the course average
A
+4.1
B
same
C
−3.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2023Fall 2025
Overall4.72 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.38
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.57
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.51
Instructor availability4.66
Instructor communication4.86
Instructor effectiveness4.71
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.54
Viola Green 10 sections · 7 terms · 2018–2021 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2018–2021
Compare with the course
Green vs. the course average
A
+4.1
B
−6.2
C
+2.3
D
+0.3
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2018Spring 2021
Overall4.65 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Tatiana Kozhanova 5 sections · 3 terms · 2016–2019 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2016–2019
Compare with the course
Kozhanova vs. the course average
A
+3.4
B
−4.3
C
+0.7
D
−0.4
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.81 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.58
Instructor clarity4.78
Course effectiveness4.74
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.84
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.72
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Anne-Marie Kuhne 16 sections · 9 terms · 2010–2013 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 16 sections · 2010–2013
Compare with the course
Kuhne vs. the course average
A
−5.7
B
+6.5
C
−0.7
D
−0.4
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Fall 2013
Overall4.87 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.76
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.86
Instructor communication4.86
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.94
Assignment measured knowledge4.74
Instructor stimulates interest4.74
Roya Mesbah 20 sections · 9 terms · 2012–2017 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 20 sections · 2012–2017
Compare with the course
Mesbah vs. the course average
A
−14.9
B
+14.1
C
+1.4
D
−0.2
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Spring 2017
Overall4.40 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.18
Instructor clarity4.24
Course effectiveness4.31
Instructor enthusiasm4.68
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.19
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.41
Instructor respectfulness4.74
Assignment measured knowledge4.31
Instructor stimulates interest4.22
Samba Sy 42 sections · 17 terms · 2014–2023 3.56GPA
Published grade shares · 42 sections · 2014–2023
Compare with the course
Sy vs. the course average
A
−11.2
B
+7.2
C
+3.1
D
+0.3
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2014Fall 2023
Overall4.70 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.49
Instructor clarity4.62
Course effectiveness4.68
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness4.64
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.76
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.49
Instructor stimulates interest4.64
Francoise Desy 11 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2012 3.53GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2010–2012
Compare with the course
Desy vs. the course average
A
−14.6
B
+10.7
C
+2.8
D
+1.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2012
Overall4.45 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Julie Hugonny 4 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2019 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Hugonny vs. the course average
A
−13.3
B
+5.5
C
+5.4
D
+2.9
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.71 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Anne-Francoise Le Lostec 9 sections · 8 terms · 2019–2025 3.39GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Lostec vs. the course average
A
−21.7
B
+17.7
C
−0.3
D
+1.5
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.74 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.59
Course effectiveness4.59
Instructor enthusiasm4.77
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.86
Instructor communication4.76
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Sophie Vainer 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Michael Wiedorn 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.70 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.