Course record ECON
ECON 2105
Principles of Macroeconomics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
122 sections29 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score21/100
Below average
Whitney Buser 2 sections · 1 term · 2022 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022
Compare with the course
Buser vs. the course average
A
+35.1
B
−24.9
C
−7.4
D
−1.6
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.34 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.15
Instructor availability4.15
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Archana Ghodeswar 7 sections · 4 terms · 2020–2022 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Ghodeswar vs. the course average
A
+26.2
B
−17.5
C
−6.1
D
−1.3
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2020Spring 2022
Overall4.38 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.92
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.23
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.47
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.02
Lin Yang 3 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.80GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Yang vs. the course average
A
+18.9
B
−9.7
C
−6.4
D
−1.6
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.04 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.94
Instructor clarity3.65
Course effectiveness4.19
Instructor enthusiasm3.95
Instructor helpfulness3.63
Instructor availability4.46
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.11
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest3.54
Jingwen Qu 2 sections · 2 terms · 2015 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Qu vs. the course average
A
+12.4
B
−2.7
C
−6.8
D
−1.6
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.19 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.27
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.13
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest3.53
Mehmet Aglar 3 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Aglar vs. the course average
A
+10.5
B
−4.5
C
−4.0
D
−0.8
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.46 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.89
Instructor clarity4.27
Course effectiveness4.27
Instructor enthusiasm4.21
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.69
Instructor effectiveness4.62
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.06
Instructor stimulates interest3.94
Leonard Stendig 11 sections · 6 terms · 2022–2025 3.61GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Stendig vs. the course average
A
+7.3
B
−4.1
C
−2.3
D
same
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2022Spring 2025
Aselia Urmanbetova 29 sections · 17 terms · 2017–2025 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 29 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Urmanbetova vs. the course average
A
+7.2
B
−4.6
C
−1.2
D
−0.6
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Fall 2025
Overall4.49 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.99
Instructor clarity4.24
Course effectiveness4.21
Instructor enthusiasm4.73
Instructor helpfulness4.29
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.61
Instructor effectiveness4.49
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Brian Hunt 10 sections · 6 terms · 2011–2015 3.59GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Hunt vs. the course average
A
+4.3
B
−1.5
C
−0.7
D
−0.9
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Fall 2015
Overall4.33 / 5
106 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.69
Instructor clarity4.06
Course effectiveness4.01
Instructor enthusiasm4.81
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.21
Instructor respectfulness4.71
Assignment measured knowledge4.09
Instructor stimulates interest3.94
Thomas Woodbury 10 sections · 7 terms · 2022–2025 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Woodbury vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
−4.1
C
−2.7
D
+0.7
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2022Fall 2025
Overall4.49 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.94
Instructor clarity4.27
Course effectiveness4.28
Instructor enthusiasm4.64
Instructor helpfulness4.11
Instructor availability4.64
Instructor communication4.54
Instructor effectiveness4.68
Instructor respectfulness4.81
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.19
Manho Kang 5 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Kang vs. the course average
A
−3.4
B
+4.9
C
+0.5
D
−1.0
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.35 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.99
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.26
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.38
Instructor effectiveness4.57
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge3.79
Instructor stimulates interest4.04
Vitor Kamada 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2015 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2015
Compare with the course
Kamada vs. the course average
A
+4.5
B
−7.7
C
+0.7
D
+1.6
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.29 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.85
Juan Rubio-Ramirez 2 sections · 1 term · 2017 3.46GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017
Compare with the course
Rubio-Ramirez vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
+11.6
C
same
D
−1.6
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.14 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.20
Instructor clarity3.10
Course effectiveness2.75
Instructor enthusiasm3.75
Instructor helpfulness2.55
Instructor availability3.45
Instructor communication3.05
Instructor effectiveness2.95
Instructor respectfulness3.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest2.60
Daniel Dench 3 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2025 3.42GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Dench vs. the course average
A
−4.8
B
+3.9
C
+0.2
D
+0.8
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.13 / 5
83 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness3.75
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.75
Austin Mctier 2 sections · 1 term · 2018 3.39GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Mctier vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
+1.1
C
+8.8
D
−1.6
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Derek Tittle 4 sections · 4 terms · 2010–2012 3.37GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2010–2012
Compare with the course
Tittle vs. the course average
A
−13.9
B
+14.7
C
+1.6
D
−1.3
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Fall 2012
Matthew Oliver 4 sections · 3 terms · 2014–2016 3.26GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2014–2016
Compare with the course
Oliver vs. the course average
A
−15.8
B
+10.4
C
+3.6
D
+2.0
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.42 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.47
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.55
Instructor helpfulness3.98
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.47
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest3.95
Mishal Ahmed 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Ahmed vs. the course average
A
−21.0
B
+7.5
C
+10.6
D
+3.5
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.57 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Richard Fritz 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2018 2.98GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2018
Compare with the course
Fritz vs. the course average
A
−34.8
B
+19.9
C
+12.8
D
+2.8
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Spring 2018
Overall3.98 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.67
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.87
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness3.83
Instructor respectfulness4.13
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Willie Belton 5 sections · 5 terms · 2010–2014 2.81GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2010–2014
Compare with the course
Belton vs. the course average
A
−38.3
B
+15.4
C
+17.7
D
+4.6
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Spring 2014
Overall3.79 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.53
Instructor clarity3.73
Course effectiveness3.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.47
Instructor helpfulness3.20
Instructor availability3.53
Instructor communication4.07
Instructor effectiveness3.63
Instructor respectfulness3.93
Assignment measured knowledge3.57
Instructor stimulates interest3.73
David Cleeton 4 sections · 1 term · 2021 2.19GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2021
Compare with the course
Cleeton vs. the course average
A
−57.3
B
+31.2
C
+3.0
D
+0.7
F
+22.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall2.12 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.65
Instructor clarity2.00
Course effectiveness1.92
Instructor enthusiasm3.23
Instructor helpfulness1.37
Instructor availability2.60
Instructor communication1.95
Instructor effectiveness1.98
Instructor respectfulness1.60
Assignment measured knowledge2.17
Instructor stimulates interest2.23
Ryan Ellis 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.81GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.64 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.60
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Xiaoyu Dong 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.77GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.63 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Elena Antoniadou 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.21 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Roshani Bulkunde 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Adrian Austin 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.52GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.16 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.61
Instructor clarity3.88
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness3.69
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.32
Instructor effectiveness4.28
Instructor respectfulness4.51
Assignment measured knowledge3.63
Instructor stimulates interest3.71
Xi Mao 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.40GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.76 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Olga Shemyakina 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.33GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.78 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.70
Instructor helpfulness3.30
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Parks Dodd 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Emtiaz Hritan 23 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.94
Instructor clarity3.10
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.94
Instructor helpfulness3.94
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness3.99
Instructor respectfulness4.15
Assignment measured knowledge3.69
Instructor stimulates interest3.81
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.