Course record ECE
ECE 8900
Special Problems
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
Grade distribution unavailable20 professors
Evaluations: 2019–2024
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Muhannad Bakir 3 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.51
Instructor clarity4.88
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability3.95
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.88
Tushar Krishna 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Vince Calhoun 2 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Shimeng Yu 3 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.83
Instructor clarity4.98
Course effectiveness4.94
Instructor enthusiasm4.98
Instructor helpfulness4.98
Instructor availability4.98
Instructor communication4.98
Instructor effectiveness4.98
Instructor respectfulness4.98
Assignment measured knowledge4.89
Instructor stimulates interest4.98
Brendan Saltaformaggio 2 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Ghassan Al-Regib 2 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Seun Sangodoyin 3 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness3.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Emmanouil Tentzeris 2 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Omer Inan 2 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Ali Adibi 3 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.25
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Saibal Mukhopadhyay 5 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.83
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.96
Instructor availability4.94
Instructor communication4.99
Instructor effectiveness4.99
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.96
Matthieu Bloch 3 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.93
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.93
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.93
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.83
Instructor stimulates interest4.83
Arijit Raychowdhury 3 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.54
Instructor clarity4.48
Course effectiveness4.78
Instructor enthusiasm4.48
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.64
Instructor communication4.62
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.81
Assignment measured knowledge4.52
Instructor stimulates interest4.68
Vincent Mooney 3 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Lukas Graber 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Hua Wang 4 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Ian Akyildiz 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Pan Li 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Suman Datta 4 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Matthew Hale 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.