Course record ECE
ECE 2026
Introduction to Signal Processing
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
75 sections40 professors
Grades: 2012–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score4/100
Needs work
David Citrin 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2022 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021–2022
Compare with the course
Citrin vs. the course average
A
+53.6
B
−27.6
C
−20.1
D
−3.5
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.50 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.05
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Jennifer Hasler 3 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2025 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Hasler vs. the course average
A
+34.6
B
−22.8
C
−5.8
D
−3.5
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall2.15 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.27
Instructor clarity1.40
Course effectiveness1.77
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness1.50
Instructor availability2.50
Instructor communication2.30
Instructor effectiveness1.40
Instructor respectfulness2.30
Assignment measured knowledge1.50
Instructor stimulates interest1.82
Jean Salvestrini 3 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.37GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Salvestrini vs. the course average
A
+24.4
B
−13.4
C
−13.4
D
−3.5
F
+5.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.63 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
David Anderson 3 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2019 3.23GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015–2019
Compare with the course
Anderson vs. the course average
A
+3.3
B
+1.5
C
−1.3
D
−1.7
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.37 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.54
Instructor clarity4.16
Course effectiveness4.32
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.12
Instructor availability4.32
Instructor communication4.34
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge4.22
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Ghassan Al-Regib 3 sections · 3 terms · 2019–2024 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019–2024
Compare with the course
Al-Regib vs. the course average
A
−0.3
B
+2.3
C
+0.7
D
−2.0
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.36 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.17
Course effectiveness4.32
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.41
Instructor communication4.39
Instructor effectiveness4.44
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Aaron Lanterman 3 sections · 3 terms · 2016–2019 3.14GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016–2019
Compare with the course
Lanterman vs. the course average
A
−1.0
B
+4.6
C
−2.7
D
+0.1
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.71 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.49
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.86
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.74
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.22
Instructor stimulates interest4.76
John Barry 14 sections · 14 terms · 2012–2025 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2012–2025
Compare with the course
Barry vs. the course average
A
+1.8
B
−0.2
C
−2.0
D
+0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Spring 2025
Overall4.13 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.55
Instructor clarity4.03
Course effectiveness4.27
Instructor enthusiasm4.13
Instructor helpfulness3.91
Instructor availability4.22
Instructor communication4.19
Instructor effectiveness4.26
Instructor respectfulness4.32
Assignment measured knowledge3.94
Instructor stimulates interest3.97
Bolin Gao 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Gao vs. the course average
A
−14.4
B
+23.4
C
−3.1
D
−3.5
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
Elliot Moore 14 sections · 14 terms · 2013–2025 3.01GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2013–2025
Compare with the course
Moore vs. the course average
A
−5.8
B
+2.8
C
+2.6
D
+0.8
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2025
Overall4.57 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.61
Instructor clarity4.54
Course effectiveness4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.74
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.49
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge4.14
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Chin-Hui Lee 12 sections · 12 terms · 2013–2025 2.99GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2013–2025
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
−4.8
B
+0.7
C
+3.4
D
+0.4
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Spring 2025
Overall3.96 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity3.58
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.16
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.16
Instructor communication4.11
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.28
Assignment measured knowledge3.91
Instructor stimulates interest3.67
Mark Clements 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2016 2.93GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2016
Compare with the course
Clements vs. the course average
A
−5.3
B
+0.6
C
−0.2
D
+3.3
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.17 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity4.27
Course effectiveness4.05
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness3.92
Instructor availability4.07
Instructor communication4.22
Instructor effectiveness4.27
Instructor respectfulness4.22
Assignment measured knowledge4.23
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Biing Juang 10 sections · 10 terms · 2012–2022 2.83GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2012–2022
Compare with the course
Juang vs. the course average
A
−12.8
B
+3.4
C
+6.6
D
+1.9
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Fall 2022
Overall3.74 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity3.59
Course effectiveness3.98
Instructor enthusiasm3.89
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability3.88
Instructor communication3.79
Instructor effectiveness3.74
Instructor respectfulness4.03
Assignment measured knowledge3.69
Instructor stimulates interest3.42
Gregory Krudysz 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.25GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Overall4.36 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity4.34
Course effectiveness4.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.34
Instructor availability4.49
Instructor communication4.39
Instructor effectiveness4.47
Instructor respectfulness4.51
Assignment measured knowledge4.36
Instructor stimulates interest4.11
Daniela Ramirez Sanchez 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.18GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
James Mcclellan 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.63GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.19 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Andrew Mcrae 5 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Mohit Prabhushankar 8 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.28
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Giorgio Casinovi 7 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity3.84
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness3.57
Instructor availability3.92
Instructor communication3.94
Instructor effectiveness3.68
Instructor respectfulness4.04
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest3.28
Fariborz Farahmand 9 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.17
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness3.95
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness3.85
Instructor respectfulness4.42
Assignment measured knowledge3.88
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Benjamin Yang 16 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.93
Course effectiveness4.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.87
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.91
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness4.99
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest4.89
Alvaro Marenco 10 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.52
Instructor clarity4.34
Course effectiveness4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.54
Instructor communication4.62
Instructor effectiveness4.51
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Assignment measured knowledge4.23
Instructor stimulates interest4.08
Rajib Bhattacharjea 10 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.95
Course effectiveness4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Theodore Harris 12 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Faramarz Fekri 14 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.74
Instructor clarity4.89
Course effectiveness4.69
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.86
Instructor effectiveness4.89
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.53
Instructor stimulates interest4.69
Brian Beck 6 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.93
Course effectiveness4.37
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest4.87
Gordon Stuber 10 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.34
Instructor clarity4.42
Course effectiveness3.98
Instructor enthusiasm4.42
Instructor helpfulness4.13
Instructor availability4.26
Instructor communication4.26
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.36
Assignment measured knowledge3.91
Instructor stimulates interest3.96
Andrew Harper 13 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Xiaoli Ma 9 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.45
Instructor clarity4.22
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm3.97
Instructor helpfulness4.22
Instructor availability4.15
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.38
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest3.88
Alenka Zajic 17 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.58
Instructor clarity4.47
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Ying Zhang 8 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.64
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.36
Instructor enthusiasm4.44
Instructor helpfulness4.13
Instructor availability4.34
Instructor communication4.42
Instructor effectiveness4.42
Instructor respectfulness4.74
Assignment measured knowledge4.14
Instructor stimulates interest3.67
Chrisopher Rozell 14 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.95
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.05
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Matthieu Bloch 15 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.45
Instructor clarity4.22
Course effectiveness3.95
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge3.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.03
Brett Walkenhorst 8 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.47
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.28
Instructor stimulates interest4.42
Pamela Bhatti 12 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.77
Instructor helpfulness4.57
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Mark Davenport 14 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.55
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Gee-Kung Chang 9 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.78
Instructor helpfulness4.22
Instructor availability4.47
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.42
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.47
Justin Romberg 15 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.05
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Jeffrey Davis 4 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Edward Coyle 12 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.15
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication3.70
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Francesco Fedele 20 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness3.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.