Course record EAS
EAS 1601
Habitable Planet
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
37 sections13 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score20/100
Below average
James Wray 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2024 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2024
Compare with the course
Wray vs. the course average
A
+18.0
B
−12.0
C
−5.5
D
−0.2
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.62 / 5
220 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Zachary Handlos 4 sections · 4 terms · 2018–2023 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2023
Compare with the course
Handlos vs. the course average
A
+15.3
B
−8.6
C
−6.2
D
+0.2
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2018Spring 2023
Overall4.76 / 5
181 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.21
Instructor clarity4.79
Course effectiveness4.46
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.59
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.81
Instructor effectiveness4.81
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.19
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Frances Rivera-Hernandez 5 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Rivera-Hernandez vs. the course average
A
+15.7
B
−11.1
C
−4.1
D
−0.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2022Spring 2025
Overall4.39 / 5
207 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.91
Instructor clarity4.37
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.66
Instructor helpfulness4.04
Instructor availability4.26
Instructor communication4.51
Instructor effectiveness4.57
Instructor respectfulness4.56
Assignment measured knowledge3.98
Instructor stimulates interest4.19
Christopher Reinhard 7 sections · 7 terms · 2015–2025 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2015–2025
Compare with the course
Reinhard vs. the course average
A
+9.9
B
−5.6
C
−4.1
D
+0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2015Fall 2025
Overall4.70 / 5
204 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.16
Instructor clarity4.76
Course effectiveness4.44
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.46
Instructor availability4.63
Instructor communication4.72
Instructor effectiveness4.76
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.21
Instructor stimulates interest4.58
Heather Chilton 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2022 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021–2022
Compare with the course
Chilton vs. the course average
A
+11.0
B
−7.0
C
−4.3
D
−0.8
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.60 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.24
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.59
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.71
Assignment measured knowledge4.32
Instructor stimulates interest4.41
Samantha Wilson 2 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.40GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Wilson vs. the course average
A
+5.8
B
−9.4
C
−0.5
D
−1.3
F
+5.4
Difference in percentage points.
Jean Lynch-Stieglitz 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2014 3.30GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Lynch-Stieglitz vs. the course average
A
−14.8
B
+12.2
C
+2.9
D
+0.2
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2014
Overall3.48 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.37
Instructor clarity3.43
Course effectiveness3.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.07
Instructor helpfulness3.20
Instructor availability3.47
Instructor communication3.83
Instructor effectiveness3.33
Instructor respectfulness3.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.37
Instructor stimulates interest2.73
Britney Schmidt 4 sections · 4 terms · 2015–2019 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2015–2019
Compare with the course
Schmidt vs. the course average
A
−19.4
B
+16.5
C
+1.3
D
+0.8
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2015Spring 2019
Overall4.12 / 5
151 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity4.08
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness3.65
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.08
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest3.77
James St John 5 sections · 5 terms · 2010–2014 2.92GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2010–2014
Compare with the course
John vs. the course average
A
−38.0
B
+20.8
C
+17.8
D
same
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2014
Overall3.40 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.40
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness3.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness2.65
Instructor availability3.65
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness3.25
Instructor respectfulness3.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.05
Michael Porter 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Overall4.40 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity4.31
Course effectiveness4.31
Instructor enthusiasm4.62
Instructor helpfulness4.32
Instructor availability4.31
Instructor communication4.47
Instructor effectiveness4.48
Instructor respectfulness4.51
Assignment measured knowledge4.09
Instructor stimulates interest4.19
Shelby Ellis 15 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.29
Course effectiveness4.28
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness4.36
Instructor availability4.43
Instructor communication4.42
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Jennifer Mcguire 170 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
170 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.45
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Meg Grantham 14 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.12
Instructor clarity4.43
Course effectiveness4.32
Instructor enthusiasm4.42
Instructor helpfulness4.27
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication4.51
Instructor effectiveness4.39
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge4.24
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.