Course record EAS
EAS 1600
Introduction to Environmental Science
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
69 sections13 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score21/100
Below average
Wing Chu 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2024 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Chu vs. the course average
A
+27.9
B
−18.1
C
−8.5
D
−0.9
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.59 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity4.54
Course effectiveness4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.68
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.61
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.36
Instructor stimulates interest4.43
Jennifer Glass 14 sections · 9 terms · 2016–2025 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2016–2025
Compare with the course
Glass vs. the course average
A
+24.2
B
−15.6
C
−6.8
D
−1.3
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Spring 2025
Overall4.66 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.72
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.71
Instructor communication4.76
Instructor effectiveness4.61
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.66
Instructor stimulates interest4.39
Zachary Handlos 6 sections · 5 terms · 2018–2025 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2018–2025
Compare with the course
Handlos vs. the course average
A
+15.1
B
−8.1
C
−7.4
D
−0.2
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2018Fall 2025
Overall4.78 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.67
Course effectiveness4.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.73
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Samantha Wilson 14 sections · 13 terms · 2019–2024 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2019–2024
Compare with the course
Wilson vs. the course average
A
+10.3
B
−4.6
C
−5.2
D
−0.3
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2019Fall 2024
Overall4.67 / 5
213 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.17
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.39
Instructor enthusiasm4.81
Instructor helpfulness4.51
Instructor availability4.71
Instructor communication4.74
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.14
Instructor stimulates interest4.41
Kenneth Ferrier 6 sections · 4 terms · 2015–2018 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2015–2018
Compare with the course
Ferrier vs. the course average
A
+4.2
B
+4.8
C
−7.9
D
−1.2
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2015Fall 2018
Overall4.82 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.48
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.57
Instructor enthusiasm4.98
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Nicole Lopanik 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Lopanik vs. the course average
A
−9.6
B
+9.6
C
−1.6
D
+2.0
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.31 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.28
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.33
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest3.77
Lewis Huey 9 sections · 9 terms · 2010–2017 3.19GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2010–2017
Compare with the course
Huey vs. the course average
A
−19.1
B
+11.9
C
+4.7
D
+2.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2017
Overall4.40 / 5
103 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.59
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.61
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.34
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.11
James St John 14 sections · 14 terms · 2010–2015 2.92GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2010–2015
Compare with the course
John vs. the course average
A
−36.7
B
+17.1
C
+19.0
D
+0.4
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2015
Overall3.55 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.37
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness3.22
Instructor enthusiasm3.98
Instructor helpfulness3.10
Instructor availability3.88
Instructor communication4.03
Instructor effectiveness3.38
Instructor respectfulness3.25
Assignment measured knowledge3.28
Instructor stimulates interest3.08
Shelby Ellis 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.42 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.04
Instructor clarity4.34
Course effectiveness4.28
Instructor enthusiasm4.49
Instructor helpfulness4.31
Instructor availability4.48
Instructor communication4.49
Instructor effectiveness4.54
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge4.16
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Liana Boop 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.37GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Michael Porter 12 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.16
Instructor clarity4.51
Course effectiveness4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.66
Instructor helpfulness4.49
Instructor availability4.54
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.41
Heather Chilton 15 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.04
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness4.46
Instructor availability4.54
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.09
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Meg Grantham 9 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.87
Instructor clarity4.48
Course effectiveness4.08
Instructor enthusiasm4.42
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.47
Instructor communication4.48
Instructor effectiveness4.44
Instructor respectfulness4.52
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.32
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.