Course record CS
CS 7001
Overview of Graduate Studies in Computing
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
19 sections16 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2013–2023
Flunk Score72/100
Strong
Alexander Endert 3 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2016 3.96GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Endert vs. the course average
A
+9.5
B
−9.9
C
+0.8
D
−0.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Nicholas Feamster 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2014 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2014
Compare with the course
Feamster vs. the course average
A
+8.4
B
−7.8
C
−0.9
D
−0.1
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.53 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Ana Anton 4 sections · 4 terms · 2018–2021 3.81GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2021
Compare with the course
Anton vs. the course average
A
−5.8
B
+5.1
C
+1.2
D
−0.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2021
Overall4.76 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.52
Rebecca Grinter 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2017 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2017
Compare with the course
Grinter vs. the course average
A
−40.1
B
+39.4
C
+1.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.78 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Cedric Pradalier 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Mayur Naik 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.38 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.60
Instructor clarity4.25
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Milos Prvulovic 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.99GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.57 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.36
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.22
Instructor enthusiasm4.73
Instructor helpfulness4.39
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.61
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest4.29
Alexandros Daglis 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Elizabeth Disalvo 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Aaron Bobick 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Andrea Parker 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.61 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Elizabeth Cherry 19 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Hyesoon Kim 50 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Merrick Furst 32 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Lance Fortnow 19 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.95
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Instructor stimulates interest3.55
Alexander Adams 25 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.36
Instructor helpfulness3.83
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.36
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.