Course record CS

CS 6999

Master's Project

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

Grade distribution unavailable20 professors
Evaluations: 2012

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 20 of 20

Christopher Peikert 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
John Stasko 1 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Gregory Abowd 1 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Irfan Essa 1 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Mark Braunstein 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Karsten Schwan 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Mark Borodovsky 1 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Konstantinos Dovrolis 1 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Umakishore Ramachandran 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Nicholas Feamster 1 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Charles Isbell 1 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Richard Fujimoto 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Aaron Bobick 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Sudhakar Yalamanchili 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor availability5.00
Ling Liu 1 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Richard Lipton 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Brian Magerko 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
James Rehg 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Mary Harrold 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Ronald Arkin 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.