Course record CS

CS 4699

Undergraduate Research

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

Grade distribution unavailable12 professors
Evaluations: 2013

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 12 of 12

Mark Riedl 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Yi-Luen Do 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Andrea Thomaz 1 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Edward Omiecinski 1 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Matthew Wolf 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Wenke Lee 1 reported responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor availability1.00
Instructor respectfulness3.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Rosa Arriaga 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Ashok Goel 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Elizabeth Disalvo 1 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Alexandra Mazalek 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Ronald Arkin 1 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
James Rehg 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.