Course record CS
CS 3750
Human Computer Interface Design and Evaluation
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
72 sections28 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2023
Flunk Score41/100
Mixed record
Amber Solomon 2 sections · 1 term · 2020 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020
Compare with the course
Solomon vs. the course average
A
+27.3
B
−22.0
C
−4.6
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Hayley Evans 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Evans vs. the course average
A
+26.3
B
−22.0
C
−3.6
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.91 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity4.93
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.93
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.97
Instructor effectiveness4.97
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Richard Henneman 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2025 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Henneman vs. the course average
A
+24.8
B
−19.5
C
−4.6
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.72 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Caleb Southern 4 sections · 4 terms · 2017–2023 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017–2023
Compare with the course
Southern vs. the course average
A
+18.5
B
−15.5
C
−2.4
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Summer 2023
Overall4.75 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.11
Instructor clarity4.74
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.68
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.51
Lauren Wilcox 3 sections · 3 terms · 2016–2018 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016–2018
Compare with the course
Wilcox vs. the course average
A
+18.2
B
−14.4
C
−3.9
D
−0.3
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.55 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.07
Instructor clarity4.43
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.57
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Maribeth Coleman 5 sections · 5 terms · 2019–2022 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2019–2022
Compare with the course
Coleman vs. the course average
A
+19.9
B
−16.5
C
−4.0
D
−0.3
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Summer 2022
Overall4.30 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.07
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.07
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.43
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.37
Instructor respectfulness4.17
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest3.93
Gregory Abowd 5 sections · 5 terms · 2015–2019 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2015–2019
Compare with the course
Abowd vs. the course average
A
+7.6
B
−3.1
C
−4.0
D
−0.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2015Fall 2019
Overall4.63 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.22
Instructor clarity4.68
Course effectiveness4.54
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.44
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.22
Instructor stimulates interest4.62
Robert Solomon 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017
Compare with the course
Solomon vs. the course average
A
+8.0
B
−4.3
C
−3.1
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.58 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Rosa Arriaga 8 sections · 7 terms · 2011–2019 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2011–2019
Compare with the course
Arriaga vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
+2.8
C
+0.4
D
−0.3
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Fall 2019
Overall3.87 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication3.50
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge3.63
Instructor stimulates interest3.48
Melody Jackson 9 sections · 9 terms · 2010–2019 3.51GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2010–2019
Compare with the course
Jackson vs. the course average
A
−15.6
B
+15.9
C
same
D
−0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2019
Overall4.73 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.78
Course effectiveness4.54
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.59
Instructor communication4.69
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.86
Assignment measured knowledge4.31
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Bruce Walker 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2018 3.45GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2018
Compare with the course
Walker vs. the course average
A
−21.2
B
+20.5
C
+1.4
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.16 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.45
Instructor communication3.75
Instructor effectiveness4.15
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge3.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Wendy Newstetter 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2016 3.41GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Newstetter vs. the course average
A
−17.2
B
+8.5
C
+9.4
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.10 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
James Foley 4 sections · 4 terms · 2010–2014 3.28GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2010–2014
Compare with the course
Foley vs. the course average
A
−35.0
B
+32.2
C
+2.7
D
−0.3
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2014
Overall4.34 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.15
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Edward Clarkson 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2014 2.93GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Clarkson vs. the course average
A
−48.3
B
+26.8
C
+18.2
D
+2.1
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Fall 2014
Overall4.16 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.87
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness3.93
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness3.97
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication3.87
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge3.67
Instructor stimulates interest3.67
Carl Disalvo 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Vedant Swain 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Overall4.88 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Charles Zeagler 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Mark Guzdial 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.85 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Christopher Le Dantec 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.89 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Valerie Summet 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Vincent Martin 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.06 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Colin Potts 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.72GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Alyssa Rumsey 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Ellen Zegura 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall3.94 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.20
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness3.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness2.90
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.60
Maia Jacobs 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.34 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Benjamin Davison 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.53GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall4.15 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Matthew Bonner 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.78 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Andrew Miller 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall4.56 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.