Course record COE
COE 2701
Startup Lab: Introduction to Technology Ventures
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
86 sections23 professors
Grades: 2016–2025Evaluations: 2016–2024
Flunk Score88/100
Excellent
Candace Washington 2 sections · 2 terms · 2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Washington vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−2.0
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Aaron Hackett 4 sections · 3 terms · 2020–2023 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2020–2023
Compare with the course
Hackett vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−2.0
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.75 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.92
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.56
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.62
Ameersing Luximon 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Luximon vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−2.0
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Brian Mcgreggor 4 sections · 4 terms · 2018–2021 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2021
Compare with the course
Mcgreggor vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−2.0
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2021
Overall4.89 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.87
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.77
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Nisha Detchprohm 2 sections · 1 term · 2023 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023
Compare with the course
Detchprohm vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−2.0
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.91 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.59
Instructor clarity4.79
Course effectiveness4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.91
Instructor availability4.94
Instructor communication4.96
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness4.94
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.91
Paul Voss 12 sections · 12 terms · 2019–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Voss vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−2.0
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.47 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.11
Instructor clarity4.37
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness4.19
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.61
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.16
Nakia Melecio 19 sections · 7 terms · 2022–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 19 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Melecio vs. the course average
A
+2.1
B
−1.8
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2022Fall 2025
Overall4.62 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.49
Course effectiveness4.41
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness4.49
Instructor availability4.66
Instructor communication4.71
Instructor effectiveness4.74
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Karthik Ramachandran 6 sections · 6 terms · 2018–2023 3.99GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2018–2023
Compare with the course
Ramachandran vs. the course average
A
+1.5
B
−1.1
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2023
Overall4.72 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.21
Instructor clarity4.67
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.77
Instructor availability4.69
Instructor communication4.79
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.43
Instructor stimulates interest4.41
Yolanda Payne 3 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Payne vs. the course average
A
+0.7
B
−0.3
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Jacqueline Garner 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Garner vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
+0.1
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.88 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.92
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Joyelle Harris 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2019 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Harris vs. the course average
A
−0.7
B
+1.0
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Roxanne Moore 2 sections · 1 term · 2024 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Moore vs. the course average
A
−0.2
B
−2.0
C
+2.2
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.63 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.17
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.52
Instructor helpfulness4.69
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.66
Instructor effectiveness4.64
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge4.48
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Henry Owen 4 sections · 4 terms · 2018–2023 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2023
Compare with the course
Owen vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
+4.3
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Spring 2023
Overall4.88 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.92
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.61
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.88
Sara Martin 2 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Martin vs. the course average
A
−5.3
B
+5.7
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.95 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.93
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.93
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.83
Michael Buchanan 6 sections · 5 terms · 2020–2023 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2020–2023
Compare with the course
Buchanan vs. the course average
A
−2.5
B
+1.9
C
−0.3
D
same
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Spring 2023
Overall4.23 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.11
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.14
Instructor enthusiasm4.33
Instructor helpfulness3.94
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.57
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness3.77
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Raghupathy Sivakumar 8 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Sivakumar vs. the course average
A
−4.4
B
+2.8
C
+1.7
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.37 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.46
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication4.66
Instructor effectiveness4.48
Instructor respectfulness4.44
Assignment measured knowledge4.06
Instructor stimulates interest4.46
Melissa Heffner 3 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Heffner vs. the course average
A
−6.0
B
+4.4
C
+1.7
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.67 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.63
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Peter Ludovice 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2019 3.86GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Ludovice vs. the course average
A
−11.6
B
+11.9
C
−0.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.49 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Alka Citrin 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Stephen Chininis 9 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Wilbur Lam 5 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.22
Instructor enthusiasm4.16
Instructor helpfulness4.14
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.16
Instructor effectiveness4.14
Instructor respectfulness4.22
Instructor stimulates interest4.14
Nishant Dass 6 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Raymond Vito 4 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness3.77
Instructor availability3.77
Instructor communication3.83
Instructor effectiveness3.93
Instructor respectfulness3.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.