Course record CHEM
CHEM 2311
Organic Chemistry I
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
99 sections17 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score6/100
Needs work
Nathan Blackburn 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 3.53GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Blackburn vs. the course average
A
+18.9
B
−8.7
C
−5.7
D
−2.9
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Pamela Pollet 33 sections · 21 terms · 2013–2025 3.44GPA
Published grade shares · 33 sections · 2013–2025
Compare with the course
Pollet vs. the course average
A
+12.9
B
−3.0
C
−6.5
D
−2.8
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2025
Overall4.55 / 5
142 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.54
Instructor clarity4.41
Course effectiveness4.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.29
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.59
Instructor effectiveness4.62
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge4.02
Instructor stimulates interest4.42
Hui Zhu 4 sections · 3 terms · 2019–2022 3.40GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2019–2022
Compare with the course
Zhu vs. the course average
A
+16.1
B
−10.7
C
−5.1
D
+1.3
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.13
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.57
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest3.87
John Tyson 12 sections · 12 terms · 2010–2025 3.28GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Tyson vs. the course average
A
+2.2
B
+4.2
C
−5.0
D
−0.9
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Fall 2025
Overall4.85 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.71
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.91
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.72
Instructor stimulates interest4.81
Charles Liotta 5 sections · 5 terms · 2010–2017 3.23GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2010–2017
Compare with the course
Liotta vs. the course average
A
+3.3
B
−2.6
C
+0.6
D
−0.8
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2017
Overall4.79 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.77
Instructor clarity4.78
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
William Baron 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.20GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Baron vs. the course average
A
+4.5
B
−4.9
C
−0.6
D
+0.8
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.64 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness4.57
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.72
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Michael Evans 5 sections · 5 terms · 2014–2024 3.07GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2014–2024
Compare with the course
Evans vs. the course average
A
−11.6
B
+13.2
C
−2.2
D
+1.1
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2014Summer 2024
Overall4.47 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.27
Course effectiveness3.98
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge3.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Stefan France 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2021 3.06GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2021
Compare with the course
France vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
+2.7
C
+3.7
D
+1.5
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.80 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.40
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.10
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.20
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
E Barefield 7 sections · 7 terms · 2011–2016 2.76GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2011–2016
Compare with the course
Barefield vs. the course average
A
−27.0
B
+15.4
C
+8.9
D
+2.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2016
Overall4.04 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.46
Instructor clarity4.14
Course effectiveness4.02
Instructor enthusiasm4.04
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.02
Instructor respectfulness4.16
Assignment measured knowledge3.42
Instructor stimulates interest3.58
John Reynolds 6 sections · 6 terms · 2014–2021 2.75GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2014–2021
Compare with the course
Reynolds vs. the course average
A
−15.4
B
−4.3
C
+14.1
D
+3.5
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2014Spring 2021
Overall3.81 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity3.48
Course effectiveness3.93
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness3.38
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication4.03
Instructor effectiveness3.68
Instructor respectfulness3.98
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.62
James Morris 2 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2013 2.70GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012–2013
Compare with the course
Morris vs. the course average
A
−20.5
B
+4.8
C
+6.6
D
+7.6
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.89 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness3.30
Instructor availability3.60
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Gary Schuster 12 sections · 8 terms · 2011–2016 2.69GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2011–2016
Compare with the course
Schuster vs. the course average
A
−16.4
B
−4.1
C
+12.9
D
+4.8
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Fall 2016
Overall4.03 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.51
Instructor clarity4.22
Course effectiveness4.09
Instructor enthusiasm4.59
Instructor helpfulness3.24
Instructor availability3.68
Instructor communication4.42
Instructor effectiveness4.03
Instructor respectfulness3.98
Assignment measured knowledge3.78
Instructor stimulates interest4.04
Christopher Haines 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.44GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Joseph Sadighi 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 3.13GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.50 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Carlos Sanhueza-Chavez 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 3.01GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.26 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Amanda Stephens 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 2.95GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.31 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Seth Marder 72 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.