Course record CHEM
CHEM 1310
Principles of General Chemistry for Engineers
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
101 sections24 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work
Kenneth Brown 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2014 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2014
Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A
+24.2
B
−7.6
C
−10.1
D
−3.9
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.74 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.25
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Joseph Sadighi 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2025 3.51GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Sadighi vs. the course average
A
+24.3
B
−13.3
C
−7.5
D
−2.4
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.63 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Mioy Huynh 9 sections · 6 terms · 2023–2025 3.42GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Huynh vs. the course average
A
+17.6
B
−9.4
C
−5.7
D
−2.0
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2023Fall 2025
Overall4.61 / 5
122 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.87
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.58
Instructor helpfulness4.37
Instructor availability4.66
Instructor communication4.66
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.82
Assignment measured knowledge3.52
Instructor stimulates interest4.28
Kimberly Schurmeier 8 sections · 6 terms · 2015–2019 3.31GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2015–2019
Compare with the course
Schurmeier vs. the course average
A
+11.0
B
−6.2
C
−2.5
D
−0.6
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2015Fall 2019
Overall4.38 / 5
127 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.12
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness4.46
Instructor enthusiasm4.58
Instructor helpfulness4.08
Instructor availability4.34
Instructor communication4.61
Instructor effectiveness4.47
Instructor respectfulness4.41
Assignment measured knowledge4.26
Instructor stimulates interest4.01
Anh Le 10 sections · 9 terms · 2021–2024 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2021–2024
Compare with the course
Le vs. the course average
A
+8.1
B
−6.4
C
−0.7
D
−1.8
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2021Fall 2024
Overall3.95 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.71
Instructor clarity3.65
Course effectiveness3.91
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness3.58
Instructor availability4.14
Instructor communication4.11
Instructor effectiveness4.08
Instructor respectfulness4.12
Assignment measured knowledge3.57
Instructor stimulates interest3.60
Carrie Shepler 12 sections · 11 terms · 2010–2021 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2010–2021
Compare with the course
Shepler vs. the course average
A
+1.1
B
+2.2
C
−2.4
D
−0.8
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2021
Overall4.42 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.06
Instructor clarity4.44
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.58
Instructor helpfulness4.21
Instructor availability4.36
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.47
Instructor respectfulness4.56
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.21
Charles Sherrill 6 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2023 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2010–2023
Compare with the course
Sherrill vs. the course average
A
−1.8
B
+5.1
C
−0.5
D
−1.7
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2023
Overall4.25 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.24
Course effectiveness3.91
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness3.67
Instructor availability4.26
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge3.52
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Carlos Silva 4 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2022 3.08GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017–2022
Compare with the course
Silva vs. the course average
A
−4.7
B
+4.9
C
−0.1
D
+0.2
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.25 / 5
163 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.60
Instructor clarity2.77
Course effectiveness3.67
Instructor enthusiasm3.15
Instructor helpfulness2.95
Instructor availability3.67
Instructor communication3.65
Instructor effectiveness3.25
Instructor respectfulness3.65
Assignment measured knowledge3.33
Instructor stimulates interest2.92
Mostafa El-Sayed 6 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2015 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2010–2015
Compare with the course
El-Sayed vs. the course average
A
−7.2
B
+3.8
C
+2.8
D
+0.6
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2015
Overall3.65 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity3.33
Course effectiveness3.95
Instructor enthusiasm4.43
Instructor helpfulness3.25
Instructor availability3.87
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest3.15
Younan Xia 5 sections · 4 terms · 2012–2016 2.93GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2012–2016
Compare with the course
Xia vs. the course average
A
−10.3
B
+6.6
C
+0.3
D
+2.4
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Fall 2016
Overall3.85 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.77
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.17
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.08
Instructor communication3.77
Instructor effectiveness3.83
Instructor respectfulness4.18
Assignment measured knowledge3.87
Instructor stimulates interest3.48
Christine Payne 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2014 2.92GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Payne vs. the course average
A
−8.9
B
+3.0
C
+1.7
D
+2.8
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.31 / 5
229 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity2.80
Course effectiveness3.60
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.10
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.50
Instructor effectiveness2.90
Instructor respectfulness3.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest2.60
Donald Doyle 15 sections · 13 terms · 2010–2019 2.89GPA
Published grade shares · 15 sections · 2010–2019
Compare with the course
Doyle vs. the course average
A
−11.3
B
+3.2
C
+5.3
D
+1.5
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2019
Overall3.86 / 5
100 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.74
Instructor clarity3.67
Course effectiveness3.84
Instructor enthusiasm4.28
Instructor helpfulness3.51
Instructor availability4.08
Instructor communication3.99
Instructor effectiveness3.73
Instructor respectfulness4.34
Assignment measured knowledge3.87
Instructor stimulates interest3.28
Robert Dickson 5 sections · 5 terms · 2012–2016 2.87GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2012–2016
Compare with the course
Dickson vs. the course average
A
−14.4
B
+8.1
C
+3.0
D
+3.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2012Spring 2016
Overall3.82 / 5
107 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity4.02
Course effectiveness3.95
Instructor enthusiasm4.03
Instructor helpfulness3.55
Instructor availability3.77
Instructor communication4.07
Instructor effectiveness3.83
Instructor respectfulness3.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.38
Michael Evans 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2020 2.84GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019–2020
Compare with the course
Evans vs. the course average
A
−17.7
B
+9.2
C
+5.5
D
+5.1
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.24 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.89
Instructor clarity4.21
Course effectiveness4.07
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.09
Instructor availability4.23
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.95
Paul Wine 4 sections · 4 terms · 2010–2013 2.82GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2010–2013
Compare with the course
Wine vs. the course average
A
−18.7
B
+10.2
C
+5.9
D
+2.2
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2013
Overall3.58 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.75
Instructor enthusiasm3.40
Instructor helpfulness3.25
Instructor availability3.75
Instructor communication4.05
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest2.95
Joseph Perry 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.13 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity2.90
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.40
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Mauna Kareti 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.55GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Marcus Cicerone 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.39GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall3.80 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.20
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Markace Rainey 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Overall4.69 / 5
142 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.82
Instructor clarity4.72
Course effectiveness3.96
Instructor enthusiasm4.73
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.72
Instructor communication4.74
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge3.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.32
Cianan Russell 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.13GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.71 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.35
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.05
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Robert Whetten 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 2.59GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall3.56 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.20
Instructor availability3.50
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.20
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
Deborah Santos 16 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.68
Instructor clarity3.58
Course effectiveness3.99
Instructor enthusiasm3.79
Instructor helpfulness3.76
Instructor availability3.92
Instructor communication3.95
Instructor effectiveness3.98
Instructor respectfulness3.86
Assignment measured knowledge3.63
Instructor stimulates interest3.67
Christy O'Mahony 5 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Leigh Bottomley 21 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.82
Instructor clarity3.81
Course effectiveness3.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.26
Instructor helpfulness3.85
Instructor availability3.86
Instructor communication3.87
Instructor effectiveness3.83
Instructor respectfulness4.02
Assignment measured knowledge3.69
Instructor stimulates interest3.65
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.