Course record CHBE
CHBE 8803
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
75 sections37 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score64/100
Strong
Matthew Realff 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Realff vs. the course average
A
+17.5
B
−17.1
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.68 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.57
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.57
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.57
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Mark Prausnitz 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2017 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2017
Compare with the course
Prausnitz vs. the course average
A
+17.5
B
−17.1
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.89 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Pamela Peralta-Yahya 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2023 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019–2023
Compare with the course
Peralta-Yahya vs. the course average
A
+17.5
B
−17.1
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.23 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.33
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.33
Instructor communication4.17
Instructor effectiveness4.33
Instructor respectfulness3.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.33
Paul Kohl 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2015 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2015
Compare with the course
Kohl vs. the course average
A
+17.5
B
−17.1
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.69 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.15
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Julie Champion 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2017 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2017
Compare with the course
Champion vs. the course average
A
+11.8
B
−11.4
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.56 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.65
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.15
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge3.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Corey Wilson 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2024 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Wilson vs. the course average
A
+11.6
B
−11.2
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.66 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.57
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.59
Instructor respectfulness4.96
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.71
Sankar Nair 6 sections · 6 terms · 2017–2025 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Nair vs. the course average
A
+9.1
B
−8.7
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Spring 2025
Overall4.13 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.92
Instructor clarity4.03
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness3.92
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.33
Instructor respectfulness4.05
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Ravi Kane 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2025 3.86GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Kane vs. the course average
A
+3.1
B
−2.7
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.75 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.75
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Yoshiaki Kawajiri 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2015 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Kawajiri vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
−0.1
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.89 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm3.65
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.65
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
James Meredith 6 sections · 6 terms · 2017–2025 3.81GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Meredith vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
+1.8
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Spring 2025
Overall4.42 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.44
Course effectiveness4.41
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.21
Instructor availability4.79
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.34
Instructor respectfulness4.69
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Peter Ludovice 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2020 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019–2020
Compare with the course
Ludovice vs. the course average
A
−4.0
B
+4.4
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.33 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Elsa Reichmanis 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Reichmanis vs. the course average
A
−4.5
B
+4.9
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.43 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness4.43
Instructor availability4.43
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.33
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.53
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Christopher Luettgen 4 sections · 4 terms · 2017–2022 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017–2022
Compare with the course
Luettgen vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+7.2
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Spring 2022
John Reynolds 4 sections · 4 terms · 2013–2020 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2013–2020
Compare with the course
Reynolds vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
+7.5
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2020
Overall4.66 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.78
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.95
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.25
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Carsten Sievers 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2019 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016–2019
Compare with the course
Sievers vs. the course average
A
−11.5
B
+11.9
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.14 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.55
Instructor clarity3.95
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.85
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication3.95
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
David Orloff 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Orloff vs. the course average
A
−17.5
B
+17.9
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.88 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Laurens Breedveld 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2018 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2018
Compare with the course
Breedveld vs. the course average
A
−9.5
B
−0.1
C
+9.6
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.70 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Sven Behrens 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2017 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2017
Compare with the course
Behrens vs. the course average
A
−24.2
B
+24.6
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2017
Overall4.72 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.77
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Nga Ng 4 sections · 4 terms · 2016–2024 3.54GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2016–2024
Compare with the course
Ng vs. the course average
A
−28.2
B
+28.6
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2024
Overall4.81 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.77
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.87
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.57
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.97
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.97
Gabriel Kwong 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.13 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness2.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Krishnendu Roy 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.38 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Alex Abramson 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Vida Jamali 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Blair Brettmann 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Overall4.88 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.92
Course effectiveness4.92
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.92
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest4.92
Nikolaos Sahinidis 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
David Sholl 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.86 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Fani Boukouvala 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.50 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Christopher Jones 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample
Andrew Medford 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.84 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Athanassios Sambanis 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.80GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall4.64 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Hang Lu 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample
Anthanasios Nenes 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.45 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness3.20
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Nian Liu 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Michael Filler 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.53GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.45 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Andreas Bommarius 6 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Peng Qiu 1 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness2.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Yulin Deng 5 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness3.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.