Course record CHBE
CHBE 2100
Chemical Process Principles
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
99 sections23 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score0/100
Needs work
Ravi Kane 4 sections · 4 terms · 2018–2024 3.16GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2024
Compare with the course
Kane vs. the course average
A
+21.0
B
−7.3
C
−4.9
D
−4.7
F
−4.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2024
Overall4.72 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.78
Instructor clarity4.84
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.39
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Peter Ludovice 2 sections · 1 term · 2016 2.96GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Ludovice vs. the course average
A
+1.6
B
+6.9
C
+2.7
D
−6.3
F
−4.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.55 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.95
Instructor clarity2.75
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.35
Instructor availability3.85
Instructor communication3.40
Instructor effectiveness2.95
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.25
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Nian Liu 7 sections · 7 terms · 2017–2025 2.95GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Liu vs. the course average
A
+4.3
B
+8.3
C
−5.7
D
−4.2
F
−2.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Spring 2025
Overall4.12 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity3.81
Course effectiveness4.28
Instructor enthusiasm4.01
Instructor helpfulness3.74
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.22
Instructor effectiveness4.13
Instructor respectfulness4.59
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.89
Christian Cuba-Torres 7 sections · 7 terms · 2017–2023 2.87GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2017–2023
Compare with the course
Cuba-Torres vs. the course average
A
+7.2
B
−3.4
C
+2.1
D
−3.7
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Spring 2023
Overall4.69 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.76
Instructor clarity4.61
Course effectiveness4.59
Instructor enthusiasm4.66
Instructor helpfulness4.47
Instructor availability4.72
Instructor communication4.71
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.61
Julie Champion 12 sections · 12 terms · 2010–2024 2.83GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2010–2024
Compare with the course
Champion vs. the course average
A
+8.3
B
−3.3
C
−4.2
D
−0.8
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Spring 2024
Overall4.78 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.78
Instructor clarity4.79
Course effectiveness4.78
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.79
Instructor communication4.84
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.52
Instructor stimulates interest4.71
Blair Brettmann 4 sections · 4 terms · 2020–2024 2.77GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2020–2024
Compare with the course
Brettmann vs. the course average
A
+9.0
B
−6.3
C
−5.5
D
+0.8
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2020Fall 2024
Overall4.25 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.61
Instructor clarity4.24
Course effectiveness4.31
Instructor enthusiasm3.96
Instructor helpfulness4.15
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication4.47
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.43
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest3.88
John Blazeck 9 sections · 9 terms · 2019–2025 2.72GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Blazeck vs. the course average
A
−3.3
B
+7.6
C
−1.0
D
−3.6
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2019Spring 2025
Overall4.74 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.78
Instructor clarity4.74
Course effectiveness4.71
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.79
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Mark Prausnitz 12 sections · 9 terms · 2010–2025 2.69GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Prausnitz vs. the course average
A
−2.5
B
+2.8
C
+3.3
D
−4.4
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2025
Overall4.68 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.77
Instructor clarity4.74
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.81
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.71
Instructor effectiveness4.81
Instructor respectfulness4.74
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.66
Ryan Lively 4 sections · 4 terms · 2013–2015 2.54GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2013–2015
Compare with the course
Lively vs. the course average
A
+0.6
B
−0.7
C
−9.5
D
+4.4
F
+5.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2015
Overall4.71 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.67
Instructor clarity4.67
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Michael Filler 8 sections · 8 terms · 2016–2025 2.53GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2016–2025
Compare with the course
Filler vs. the course average
A
−7.6
B
+1.6
C
+1.3
D
+7.1
F
−2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2016Summer 2025
Overall4.59 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.64
Instructor clarity4.73
Course effectiveness4.54
Instructor enthusiasm4.82
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.33
Instructor communication4.66
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.69
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Christopher Jones 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2016 2.47GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2016
Compare with the course
Jones vs. the course average
A
−5.7
B
−1.1
C
−0.1
D
+4.5
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.51 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness4.05
Instructor availability4.15
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Nga Ng 5 sections · 5 terms · 2011–2024 2.46GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2011–2024
Compare with the course
Ng vs. the course average
A
−6.5
B
−4.9
C
+7.3
D
+4.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Spring 2024
Overall4.51 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.04
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.71
Assignment measured knowledge4.14
Instructor stimulates interest4.41
Lakeshia Taite 4 sections · 4 terms · 2010–2012 2.46GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2010–2012
Compare with the course
Taite vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+1.7
C
−3.5
D
+6.7
F
+1.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2012
Carsten Sievers 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2015 2.42GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Sievers vs. the course average
A
−10.6
B
−0.5
C
+3.5
D
+9.9
F
−2.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.80 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.27
Instructor enthusiasm4.03
Instructor helpfulness3.53
Instructor availability3.93
Instructor communication3.97
Instructor effectiveness3.73
Instructor respectfulness3.53
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.63
Pradeep Agrawal 6 sections · 6 terms · 2011–2015 2.31GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Agrawal vs. the course average
A
−10.8
B
−9.2
C
+16.2
D
+0.4
F
+3.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Fall 2015
Overall4.47 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.67
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness3.88
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge3.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.22
Ronald Rousseau 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2014 2.27GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013–2014
Compare with the course
Rousseau vs. the course average
A
−5.5
B
−2.6
C
−7.7
D
+4.3
F
+11.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.29 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.25
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.55
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Patritsia Stathatou 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.05GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Rachel Chen 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.89 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Solomon Oyakhire 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 2.84GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Yonathan Thio 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 2.64GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.60 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Sven Behrens 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 2.57GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall3.77 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication2.90
Instructor effectiveness3.40
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.60
Hang Lu 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 2.53GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.42 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
William Koros 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.33GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.