Course record CEE
CEE 8811
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
17 sections20 professors
Grades: 2010–2020Evaluations: 2012–2022
Flunk Score84/100
Excellent
Michael Rodgers 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2015 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Rodgers vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−5.3
C
same
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Spring 2015
James Frost 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2020 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2020
Compare with the course
Frost vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−5.3
C
same
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2014 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2014
Compare with the course
Amekudzi-Kennedy vs. the course average
A
−12.3
B
+12.3
C
same
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.59 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.37
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Laurie Garrow 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample
Randall Guensler 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall3.85 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness3.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication3.50
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Susan Burns 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
David Scott 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.72 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.60
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Kenneth Will 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.83 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.58
Instructor clarity4.82
Course effectiveness4.72
Instructor enthusiasm4.82
Instructor helpfulness4.84
Instructor availability4.84
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.84
Assignment measured knowledge4.76
Instructor stimulates interest4.84
Yang Wang 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.55 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.47
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.63
Instructor communication4.57
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Patricia Mokhtarian 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.91 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity4.87
Course effectiveness4.73
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.87
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.93
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
John Taylor 7 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Jorge Macedo 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Haiying Huang 8 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Lauren Stewart 11 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Rafi Muhanna 15 reported responses 3.52Eval / 5
Overall3.52 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.80
Instructor clarity3.25
Course effectiveness3.30
Instructor enthusiasm3.75
Instructor helpfulness3.40
Instructor availability3.85
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness3.55
Instructor respectfulness3.95
Assignment measured knowledge2.40
Instructor stimulates interest3.15
Phanish Suryanarayana 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Arash Yavari 33 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.07
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.57
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Glaucio Paulino 36 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.55
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Jingfeng Wang 2 reported responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm2.00
Instructor helpfulness3.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Aris Georgakakos 3 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.