Course record CEE
CEE 3000
Civil Engineering Systems
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
65 sections23 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score12/100
Needs work
Georgene Geary 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2022 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2022
Compare with the course
Geary vs. the course average
A
+26.3
B
−21.9
C
−4.1
D
+0.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.35 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.93
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.57
Instructor helpfulness4.23
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.57
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Michael Meyer 4 sections · 1 term · 2011 3.61GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011
Compare with the course
Meyer vs. the course average
A
+16.6
B
−7.3
C
−7.7
D
−1.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Alexander Samoylov 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2012 3.48GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Samoylov vs. the course average
A
+7.0
B
+0.6
C
−7.1
D
−0.2
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.20 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability3.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Sotira Yiacoumi 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2014 3.44GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Yiacoumi vs. the course average
A
+12.4
B
−13.7
C
+1.2
D
−0.3
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2014
Overall3.84 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.57
Course effectiveness4.07
Instructor enthusiasm3.87
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.07
Instructor communication4.13
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.33
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest3.33
Yi-Chang Tsai 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2017 3.43GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2017
Compare with the course
Tsai vs. the course average
A
+7.8
B
−6.2
C
−3.1
D
+1.8
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Laurie Garrow 7 sections · 4 terms · 2010–2020 3.40GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2010–2020
Compare with the course
Garrow vs. the course average
A
+6.9
B
−5.3
C
−2.7
D
+0.9
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2020
Overall4.65 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.28
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.72
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Susan Burns 2 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2017 3.39GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015–2017
Compare with the course
Burns vs. the course average
A
−1.0
B
+6.1
C
−4.5
D
−0.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.61 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Marc Stieglitz 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2014 3.19GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013–2014
Compare with the course
Stieglitz vs. the course average
A
−7.4
B
+4.2
C
−0.6
D
+4.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.90 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.55
Instructor clarity3.05
Course effectiveness3.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.65
Instructor stimulates interest3.45
Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy 23 sections · 17 terms · 2010–2025 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · 23 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Amekudzi-Kennedy vs. the course average
A
−15.1
B
+12.3
C
+2.4
D
+0.2
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2025
Overall4.50 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.28
Instructor clarity4.39
Course effectiveness4.27
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.22
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.52
Instructor effectiveness4.62
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.26
Francesco Fedele 3 sections · 1 term · 2010 3.08GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010
Compare with the course
Fedele vs. the course average
A
−9.1
B
−9.1
C
+19.8
D
−1.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Austin Ladshaw 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.91 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Yongsheng Chen 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
David Ederer 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall3.62 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.46
Instructor clarity2.96
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.82
Instructor helpfulness3.28
Instructor availability3.50
Instructor communication3.88
Instructor effectiveness3.85
Instructor respectfulness4.36
Assignment measured knowledge3.62
Instructor stimulates interest3.34
Caleb Weed 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.40 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Adair Garrett 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.52GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Elise Barrella 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.35GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Susan Hotle 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.32GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.60 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Prerna Singh 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.04 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness3.77
Instructor enthusiasm4.18
Instructor helpfulness4.08
Instructor availability4.82
Instructor communication3.92
Instructor effectiveness4.21
Instructor respectfulness4.28
Assignment measured knowledge3.81
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Franklin Gbologah 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.11GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Michael Rodgers 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 3.02GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample
Robert Simon 35 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.23
Instructor availability4.27
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Instructor stimulates interest4.08
Jamie Fischer 21 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity3.65
Course effectiveness3.56
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness3.97
Instructor availability3.75
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.60
Instructor respectfulness4.28
Assignment measured knowledge3.55
Instructor stimulates interest2.85
Lisa Rosenstein 24 reported responses 3.51Eval / 5
Overall3.51 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.64
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.58
Instructor availability3.88
Instructor communication4.13
Instructor effectiveness3.67
Instructor respectfulness2.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.