Course record BMED

BMED 4699

Undergraduate Research

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

Grade distribution unavailable24 professors
Evaluations: 2013–2016

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 24 of 24

Susan Thomas 1 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Cassie Mitchell 5 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.97
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Machelle Pardue 1 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Melissa Kemp 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Robert Guldberg 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Edward Botchwey 1 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.83
Instructor clarity4.88
Course effectiveness4.67
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.88
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.88
Esfandiar Behravesh 1 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Robert Butera 1 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.67
Instructor clarity4.67
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Dongmei Wang 1 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Stephen Deweerth 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Todd Sulchek 1 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.67
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.67
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Michael Davis 1 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Lena Ting 2 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Wei Sun 2 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Yonggang Ke 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Ajit Yoganathan 3 reported responses 1.83Eval / 5
Overall1.83 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Course effectiveness3.00
Instructor enthusiasm2.00
Instructor helpfulness2.00
Instructor availability1.00
Instructor effectiveness2.00
Instructor respectfulness3.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest1.00
Eberhard Voit 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Mark Borodovsky 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Gang Bao 1 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Joseph Ledoux 2 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Todd Mcdevitt 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Krishnendu Roy 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Michelle Laplaca 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Julia Babensee 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.